Search results

Woakes is utter tripe outside England. Opening the bowling what a laugh

it also means we settled the contracts which means pay offs. I forgot all about bright and mason

don’t agree Moore vs Morosi - really? Can’t see it being much below £17 million at all and it’s certainly no worse than Luton - our issue is many players in tbe first team squad are really sun standard abs aren’t considered

The "lump" who plays like a striker who is perfect for their team and bullied our defence constantly FFS

I am talking gross wages of both clubs. Gyokeres, Bidwell, Waghorn, Sheaf (who was on loan in the latest accounts), Kane, Moore are going to be adding at least £3 million to the gross wage bill. The extensions on Allen, Hamer, Kelly, Godden, O Hare also are in effect pay rises

I would estimate £17 million

The last 2 season of published accounts show £13 million net return after signings on players

Well its £13 million in the last set of accounts. I am assuming that does not include the wages of Waghorn, Gyokeres, Kane, Bidwell, Sheaf (?) and any wage contribution for the loans. Yes we sold players but they are ones you would assume are on far lower wages. We also have offered extensions...

What players have we signed with higher resale value? 3 in all probability all of whom are integral to the team. Luton raised according to the last published accounts £13 million profit in transfer fees over the last 2 seasons, they have virtually an identical wage bill and that I think is...

Well I would be pretty sure our wage bill is higher than last nights opponents - at the very worst it is similar and despite they having apparently 7 injuries they had a reasonable bench of recognised players I am sure someone in the know said Hillsner was on £4,000 a week here. That would...

I don't see the relevance of that at all. Our strategy is totally different to Lutons in terms of player purchases.

Oh dear

Budget is a vague term but I would be very surprised if our wage bill was not bigger than Luton this season or certainly very similar

Which again shows poor planning by the club

I do David - amazing you have me on "ignore"

The problem is no one really would know. Its showing correct now but the image is doing the rounds even though it has a different profile picture and a later date than this one

Do you think that is genuine or fake?

Luton and Millwall are on the up and also the actual numbers don't tell you a lot - if its 26 players with significant experience compared to clubs which have players with little experience in this league

No correlation to league position then

Its out choice to have a small squad