Search results

Surely she could sue for defamation of character couldn't she. If the conviction remains safe and he has been slinging mud around, then she would have a great case for damages.

My fear is that should Armstrong get sent off (missing for 3 games), or get injured for a few weeks, it's going to be tough to suddenly go out and find an emergency loan striker capable of 15-20 goals. Of the people who have seen Lateef Elford-Alliyu , what do you think of him? Is he a goal...

Thing is Grendel. it is irrelevant what Evans' clan want. You would surely have confidence in the legal appeal process to be conducted correctly and properly. What Evans' followers want is totally irrelevant. As long as the appeal is done all above board then justice will prevail. It's all...

Well yeah, but Maddison can be seen as more a replacement for Ryan Kent, rather than Armstong. Armstrong is the one true goal-getter we have. Armstrong looks well on course to bag 20 goals. What we need now is someone to compliment that. A striker capable of 15 goals plus. We are not going to...

I would say now that the one thing we could do with to complete the jigsaw is another goal poacher to compliment Adam Armstong. As soon as Armstrong is missing we do struggle to score goals. Everything else in the the Sky Blue garden is now beginning to look a lot more rosy again. Back...

Yes agree and I assume that might well form part of his defence. Agree on the last point too. I can't see it being relevant at all unless she has previously made false rape allegations, but if so, then the police would obviously have had record of it.

I'm getting forgetful in my old age, but if she wasn't claiming rape, why was it that she went to the police again?

Was hoping the clue was in the title 'Ched Evans.' As he doesn't play for Coventry City, you would possibly have come to the conclusion that this thread now has nothing to do with Coventry City Football Club and therefore you would choose simply to not click on the thread.

Guilty or not, there are some things that don't sit right with this case.

Yeah, but in a trial don't you have the right to try and prove whether someone is a relaible and credible witness or not?

As I said before, Nick, had that been a bloke with a girl, rather than a woman with a boy, it would have been a completely different outcome.

Yep, can't argue with that.

Yep, very surprised that this has been broadcast for the whole world to see. First we shouuld have heard about it should have been at the appeal.

Of course, on the other hand, if the conviction does prove to be safe, that's an awful lot more mud raking and despair for the girl to endure. It should have been completely water-tight first time. Every single witness statement taken and every bit of available footage shown in court.

It is so annoying though if it is true that many witnesses were seemingly not called at the orignal trial and that supposed key evidence was not submitted. The whole thing appears to be a bit of a pig's ear, even if it is proved the conviction was safe. Seems like an awful lot of stuff may have...

That cant be right, cos David O'Day said so!! :thinking about::D

Nice one, Macca!!! :D

I'm quite happy Wales lost. Now just a token England effort to go for the day and it'll be job done.

Unless his kepper has a blinder and keeps the ball out of course.

And now look at you! Some things just never change. :D