Search results

it was, but it's on youtube somewhere I think

would guess so. we've got the players contracts, if you don't give us the share we'll take you to court etc. FL reaslise they've made a mistake and try to keep it quiet until players and share are reunited. will now hope it all blows over and they don't have to take any action.

Sheff is in this 30s now isn't he and probably on a decent wage for the level he's been playing at. A lot of clubs are looking to make savings so may not match his wages and he might not fancy moving his wife and kids out of the area if he thinks he's only got a year or two left in him. I'd...

they can do whatever they like with the golden share. the bigger issue is what legal action SISU will take against them and if they are prepared to defend it and what happens to the players. technically if SISU have them under contract and keep paying them they wouldn't move with the share...

we're in the area of what can be done legally v what is against league rules (should they ever decide to enforce any of them). you can transfer assets between companies you own so long as you're not up to something such as asset stripping. That may be the best route legally, someone would have...

the 4 tickets thing is being reported as you can buy away tickets from Pompey for some reason and by midweek they had only sold 4. I would guess on top of that you have to add those sold by Morecombe themselves.

I'm absolutely raging and can't believe any individual or organisation can be this weak and incompetent. To be honest I feel like giving up, football is supposed to be a fun pastime, not something that has you constantly angry and in a bad mood. I'm getting to the stage where I'm thinking what's...

I was wondering that. Is this like Sunderland blaming us for them not getting enough points over the season to avoid relegation?

you're making the assumption that the Golden Share has to be tied to the administration process. It doesn't the FL can issue the golden share to whoever they feel like. In the Portsmouth administration Harris was the preferred bidder for a period of time, he withdrew when the FL stated they...

Didn't the club also reject ACLs proposal of a sliding scale of rent dependent on division in preference for a flat rate? If I've remembered that correctly presumably they did so as they thought we'd be in the prem and they'd be laughing all the way to the bank or do those who criticize ACL for...

wasn't that the reason he gave for leaving? couldn't do internationals and domestic as it was too much work, although I think they said on CWR he now works for Bristol City.

they do it so they can get the shot with Wembley in the background

I haven't lived in Coventry since 1992, I travel 162 miles each way to the Ricoh, Sixfields is closer. Last Sunday I was not at Sixfields I was at the Ricoh and I won't be at Sixfields for any other games. If the location is insignificant can we just start moving teams all over the place? Lets...

as they're so concerned about the use of taxpayers money I presume they will also be filing for a JR against Northampton Council as they have a hand in financing development at Sixfields and the rugby ground.

How can Joy be signing on behalf of companies she's supposedly not involved with, does this not add weight to the argument she is acting as a shadow director?

this is a key point. fisher keeps going on about revenue streams etc but when you account for the next few years lost revenue and the cost of the new stadium how does it stack up? if there was a credible business plan there might be a bit more support for a new stadium but there's nothing.

people are getting a tad carried away. we've won one out of three games and let in 10 goals in the process. we're 7 points away from being out of the relegation zone and yet I've heard talk of the play offs. what happens when the injuries and suspensions start mounting up or when someone gives...

You can't speak for everyone. Other clubs fans protested the groundshare and their clubs refused it, why do you assume we would just accept it and not follow the example set by the likes of Walsall?

It doesn't follow that if we weren't at Northampton we would be groundsharing elsewhere. Remember initially it had to be within 30 miles of Coventry and in the West Midlands, the clubs that met that condition all refused. If NTFC had followed their example and also refused rather than being so...

they've transferred the share to a newco, why didn't they do the same as they did at Pompey and say they would only grant the share either to certain parties (those who would keep the club in Coventry) or with certain conditions (such as honoring the lease for the Ricoh)