Search results

  1. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    they'd have no chance if NT were to get promoted before they start work on the stadium. Football League rules stipulate a club can only move into a new stadium if it would not adversely affect Clubs having their registered grounds in the immediate vicinity of the proposed location. Not sure if...
  2. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Even without an answer from N&B we know Fisher and Labovich have lied as they both stated they were talking to 2 councils.
  3. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    SBT included Solihull – no such discussions was the response
  4. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    If you turn down a FOI request I think you have to state a reason so it will give the game away anyway as they'll have to say something like the information requested can't be provided due to commercial confidentiality.
  5. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Quick look on Google Maps it looks like it is in use as farmland, anyone know for sure. Land hasn't different classifications doesn't it, would land that's currently used for farming be tricky to get planning permission on?
  6. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    You can get some smaller councils but they dont have full responsibility, for Leamington they are overseen by Warwick District Council who are the planning authority for the area so there would be no point in talking to Leamington Town Council as they aren't involved.
  7. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    maybe someone should ask what the point is of the meeting when there's no plans for anyone to see and we know there's no potential site SISU are looking at in the 'Coventry area'.
  8. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    So either a) nothing has actually been done at all and there is no new stadium or b) it's further away than they've said. If it's none of those who have responded what's next closest, Birmingham? By the time you look to move even further away you're going to be getting objections from existing...
  9. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Does anywhere else come within the "9 miles of the council house" or are we now looking at moving even further away from the city. When does it stop even being in the "Coventry area"?
  10. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Only if N&B respond and say yes, even then it would only be one and Fisher and Labovich have both clearly stated they've been talking to two. The response from Rugby said they'd been spoken to about a training ground not a stadium. It also said it was unacceptable where Fisher and Labovich had...
  11. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    That's not right, it very clearly shows they have been lying. Two quotes about the new ground (not about a training ground) Fisher "the Club were currently in discussions with 2 other councils and presenting the benefits and economic impact of a multi-purpose stadium. Both those councils...
  12. chiefdave

    FAO: The Trust - Question about Q&A

    Shall we have a sweepstake on how long it will be untill a BS statement appears on ccfc.co.uk?
  13. chiefdave

    world cup 2022

    From the sounds of things Australia and US bid teams are seriously considering legal action against FIFA as one of the conditions of the bid is that it has to be held in the summer. Most of the European leagues have already spoken out against it and are saying it will mess up the football...
  14. chiefdave

    world cup 2022

    Confirmed today that it's being moved to Winter. They're saying Nov - Jan which could mean it's not even in the right year and the Euro qualifiers might have to start before the World Cup. What an absolute farce.
  15. chiefdave

    How difficult is it.......

    Are those driving planning to drive thinking of going right to the stadium? If so you're probably better off (cheaper and quicker) finding the furthest out tube with a car park. If you're coming down the M1 try Barnet (40 mins by tube) or for M40 Hillingdon (1 hour by tube). If you're feeling...
  16. chiefdave

    Cov Vs Arsenal on the friday Night - 24 Jan

    It's a 7:45 kick off isn't it? The same as any league / cup games on a Tuesday / Wednesday and people don't get upset about that. Could understand the problem if it was moved to 8 and caused problems with getting back but there's no chance of extra time so won't be a problem to get back in time...
  17. chiefdave

    FAO: The Trust - Question about Q&A

    Odd to wait, whatever the answers from the others it would give some indication. If one's a yes then we'll have an idea where it could be, if they're all no then it only leaves one possible option - and might put a bit of pressure on them to hurry up and answer.
  18. chiefdave

    Cov Vs Arsenal on the friday Night - 24 Jan

    See what you mean, that makes sense.
  19. chiefdave

    FAO: The Trust - Question about Q&A

    could someone that knows how to do these things do a freedom of information request to all the neighbouring councils?
  20. chiefdave

    Cov Vs Arsenal on the friday Night - 24 Jan

    should be a 7:45 kick off if that makes a difference to anyone. on the plus side there should be people at the FA / FL if a protest is held in the day but will be hard to get the sort of numbers to a protest we could have got on a weekend.
Top