Search results

If they know of grooming gangs at large I assume they’ve contacted the Police?

Telegraph (grabs tin hat) reports both were present but doing gym work to return from injuries that aren’t considered serious, which tallies up with both the story and the pictures. Pitchforks down everyone.

How would that even make sense? I can’t swim so excuse me if I don’t follow you into the deep end.

Any way, regardless of what the issue was last summer it seems a way forward has been found if all these rumours are to be believed so let’s hope we can chalk it up as yet another pointless SBT argument and get back to Cov next season.

And the restriction on future legal action. Why is it so hard for you to admit this? It’s there in black and white on both statements.

Yeah I’m a computers guy not a cars guy, more interested in the gadgets in the car than the car itself. Weird thing is I’d never act like the car guys do when talking to a normie about computers. Just accept you’re weird and to most people it’s just a tool. Mine was written off recently...

Not doing this again. Read my posts in the other thread, both Sisu and Wasps agree what the sticking points were.

Oh, so we weren’t just being pedantic. You were trying to make a point. (And no, still incorrect)

Literally the first result: All the ideologies I stated are compatible with that. Jesus all government “regulates the means of production, distribution, and exchange by the community”. That’s what legislation is. As I say it’s a very broad term you’re trying to shoehorn into a very small...

Thats my litmus test for these things: Do they required thousands of normal people to be in on it? If so definite bollocks.

Calm down guys. People post snippets they hear and you’re free to add as much salt as you like. Every chance they had knocks that looked worse until properly assessed.

While we are being accurate, the undertaking requested is to stop future attempts to reverse the Ricoh sale, which includes legal avenues ;)

I mean my rent is way more than my landlord pays in mortgage. Fact is it’s the only gig in town so they can kinda name their price. I’d argue though it’d stick in the craw £1m/yr is less than we’d lose from reduced attendances (assuming at least half the season is played in front of fans), so...

I dunno. The whole thing fascinates me, there seems to be a combination of mistrust of officialdom and lack of general knowledge. I remember talking to a flat earther once and they pray on you not knowing the finer details so something sounds plausible. In this case I knew that maths for GPS...

£1m/year they can fuck off (though it’s comparable to Brum by all accounts), unless there’s full access and a decent pitch. Hahaha love how now I’m negotiating price in my own head, maybe it’s not that straightforward!

It can’t all be match day costs though, we must be paying a base rental rate.

Yeah but I can sort of understand if we needed one stand open and now it’s two or three that we might need to pay a bit more base rent.

Oh yeah, and like me you probably enjoyed a good conspiracy theory in your youth. But there is some engagement with the “truth” beyond “it’s all bollocks, I’ll believe anyone on YouTube who tells a nice story”

I think it’s stupid. Would be like my landlord charging me more cos I got a promotion. Unless we need more of the ground open of course.

When did he play for us mate? (agreed if he’d come down on wages he’s perfect)