Search results

The other issue is that isn't any new signing only supposed to be on something like 75% of the wages of the outgoing player? If Clarke is leaving because he can get paid more elsewhere it stands to reason anyone at his level isn't going to come here as we can't pay them enough so we'll be either...

You would really need early access to the ground to put them on every seat. When you go to Wembley they have a rubber band holding the card on, must take a while to do. No matter if Arsenal approve of the protest or not I'm certain they can't be seen to be supporting it.

Good to see you've put some time in to make some constructive critism and proposed an alternative protest as you feel this one won't be effective.

We know they are only checking once a year which will be between seasons. If, as seems likley, by the first check there are no plans, site purchased or planning permission applied for something must be done by the league surely?

Why the assumption that just because he's put in a transfer request he will be disruptive on the squad. Given that SISU have said they will only sell for a very high offer why not try and hold on to him. Other clubs battle to keep their players why should we just roll over? Not sure he will...

Clear enough to me, if a future application came in there is no choice but to consider it (that's a long way from saying there is any chance of getting permission) and any talks the club have had with N&B council are at such an early stage no one has even bothered to tell him about it. Yet...

You also have to add on the cost of the existing AVRO loan (that's more than £1.2m a year isn't it) plus the cost of any addtional borrowing to cover losses while at Sixfields. We're looking at £3m upwards a year. We're told £1.2m a year at the Ricoh was crippling the club yet this is...

What law would be broken doing this? As far as I can see the match hasn't been fixed in any way.

Good stuff. Would it be possible to get some A4 signs with WHY on one side and WHEN on the other, some small print on each side explaining what to do when and why and distribute them outside the ground?

How many can we get in under the one in one out rule after those that have left in the last week or two? Remember those coming in can only be on a % of the wages of the player who's gone out.

This is why it's such a stupid idea. It's SISU shooting themselves in the foot again when there is no need just to stick two fingers up to those who don't go to Sixfields, bit like the stadium forum meeting. If they'd said 1 or 2 per ST neither ST holders or anyone else would be complaining...

At a guess because it would be such an insignificant game overseas, probably means a slightly longer. Prem games are shown live all round the world, depending on the bookies source for updates you could have a while to get the bet on. Just think how long it takes the likes of BBC, Sky etc to...

So that would be one ticket per season ticket holder then. In what way are the remaining 3 tickets going to people who 'pays the club'?

We should forget about the playoffs, if we get into the top 6 at some point start talking about them but while we're chasing then forget it. Bit worried that having released a couple of players Waggott is now sounding like we're not going to be bringing many in. With a very small squad and...

Indeed and very little in the way of options on the bench to make any changes.

With any new owner planning not to play at the Ricoh and build a new ground I would want to know the same thing I want to know from SISU. That is how is it a financial benefit to CCFC over a return to the Ricoh, even if that return to the Ricoh was not as owners. I would want to know why they...

Sure this is just someone on the wind up and I don't for a second believe this was ever the plan when SISU moved us but if CCC don't cave in will the thought cross SISUs mind to look into it? Ground is being done up (paid for by the council!) and I've heard that Cardoza wants out in the not too...

Like the idea of 'your club could be next'.

The Ricoh cost £113m to build, by that logic is it still worth at least that much?

But you would assess the risk and how much chance you have of a) not losing your money and b) making a profit, preferably one greater than you could make from investing elsewhere. Who is going to look at CCFC and think there's a business that will be worth £60+ million in a few years? Assuming...