Search results

No. I’ve been saying the idea that CCC are trying to destroy CCFC for thirty years is a conspiracy theory. Ive also been saying the idea Gilbert and the CT are part of that plan is a conspiracy theory. Which this kinda proves.

Well my working theory has been there’s some future legal action planned against the council of the state aid goes against them that will somehow threaten Wasps lease. This fits that I guess. Need to know the details of what it is.

Just listened. Lot clearer now. Wasps dropped the requirement for their own indemnity. If it’s CCC then how is that the state aid remedy as they’d be the recipients of any remedy?? Got to say, can we now hand it to Lego head? He’s done more investigative journalism than all the rest put...

If that’s what happened. No. But there’s no indication of strong arming and I don’t see how they could strongarm a third party business against their will.

Ah! It is being said it didn’t include Wasps? Getting it now! What time was this on CWR does anyone know? I’d like to listen

That’s not what’s being said?

I mean they haven’t lied as far as I can tell. They’ve just refused to break the NDA. Until we know what’s in the indemnity/promise to not sue we don’t know who’s closer to the truth (I’m guessing both are saying just what they want).

What we need to know is the details of the indemnity. That’s been the argument for two years. Confirming the caterer is on the NDA doesn’t really mean much other than Wasps are hiding behind it. Which we knew because they could’ve released the indemnity details regardless.

Anyone got a link to him on CWR?

Just read Gilbert’s twitter. There’s literally nothing there we haven’t been saying for days. Someone ELI5 please?

Im lost. What exactly has been confirmed?

To be clear I’ve just woken up and come on this thread so haven’t read or heard anything. Links appreciated.

Sorry has this been confirmed? Because Wasps have repeatedly denied this and as I said I can’t see how it would work legally.

To be clear. Not on about the NDA. That was always a smokescreen and even if there were more parties wouldn’t have to have stopped Wasps and Sisu releasing what concerned only them But people seem surprised the indemnity isn’t just against Wasps. That’s been the issue from the start since...

Oh not the NDA. That was always a red herring. But we knew Wasps wanted Sisu to halt legal action against anyone to do with the Ricoh, they’ve said as much Repeatedly. Why wouldn’t that include CCC? Seems blatantly obvious I’m confused why it’s a revelation?

This isn’t news? We knew this already. It was blatantly obvious. Have I missed something?

Don’t think you can second guess. If they’re of the right quality get them in, they can only be recalled in Jan can’t they? We might have to get someone in, but equally we might get three crazy offers for our players and sell up anyway. My only worry would be does it prevent the players from...

Coalpit fields

Don’t know how I missed that thread. Looks decent.

Let’s party like it’s 1995!