Search results

Who said it was? You asked if it had been written for the purpose of the UK leaving. It wasn't, it was written to be part of the process should any country want to leave. It's nothing to do with any concession

Eh? Don't know what you mean?

It was written years ago. By an Englishman!

I wouldn't know to be honest. I know several countries have taken on large numbers of extra customs officers but I don't know beyond that. But again, no deal will hurt them, but the burden will be shared. We will take a massive hit.

It will in the case on a no deal. Even if a deal is struck I think the ECJ will have no more say in UK matters.

I'm not sure why anyone would think we're ready for a no deal scenario. A quick Google pulls up many reports, Some produced by government agencies which detail why we aren't.

Which lines has she bent? I don't think she has. Maybe she would have done if chequers had been accepted by her party bit it wasn't. Freedom of movement and the Irish border appear to be insurmountable issues at the moment.

in order for us not to leave with no deal either the Government, the DUP or the EU is going to have to allow one of their 'red lines' to be crossed.

Got a lot of stick from their support at times but they haven't had an owner since who has ran the club as well as he did. Sometimes you don't realise what you have until it's gone. Sounds like the new owners, although very wealthy, are a couple of chancers.

and I think that's what will swing Robins to include him.

they do, and religion won't save them.

I believe very strongly, (and I'm fairly sure it's provable), that a person can be moral without being religious. In fact, it's one of the biggest myths that some religious people peddle, that you need religion to be moral. (sorry to have gone off topic).

fucks sake. Ridiculous that you had to go to such lengths. Fucking scumbags. Impacting on peoples lives like that.

there is, but isn't it funny how they can ignore legislation put in place on the mainland when it suits.

thought this thread was a bit too cordial!!

They say they want Northern Ireland to be the same as the Great Britain. If they support laws that are different from those in Britain then they only want Northern Ireland to be the same when it suits. It's not a freedom of speech issue or a religious issue, it's an hypocrisy issue. If the DUP...

point missed again, as usual. The DUP is a political party which insists it doesn't want any divergence Greta Britain, but actually allows it to happen when it suits. My post is nothing to do with whether I agree with their beliefs or not, it's to do with their hypocrisy.

Am I right to say that an agreed deal at this stage isn't a trade deal but the agreed conditions under which negotiations on a trade deal can start?

Not really sure you've answered my question .