Search results

Oh and 3) have they had any communication about the state aid case progress?

1) (the only really important one) Will the confirm they do not require indemnity as part of the Ricoh deal? If so have they informed Wasps of this? If not lose your shit quite frankly. 2) Will they confirm they’ll support any application for a new ground at UoW? Don’t accept the “look at each...

I think we’re a long way from having owners who would willingly invite a counter balance into the room. Maybe when all this is over and things aren’t quite so binary.

As I’ve said before if you want to bend it to your will you’ll have to have people (at least initially) who are willing to exceed the time and effort of those currently in charge. And we’ve seen that’s hardly SBTs style. Ultimately as it stands if what you want is a group to be friendly and...

I’d suggest people leave. What else can you do? Noises were good when Pete and Mark first reached out I believe but simply avoiding stuff like emailing members and allowing remote access (especially right now!) is inexcusable really. The formal mechanism of the Trust was useful when the very...

OK mate

Im just saying, at some point you’d be better off buying a massive ad campaign saying “Joy’s a ball breaking bitch”.

No idea. Not even sure what that means TBH. Maybe? It was just clear what Wasps were doing from the start if your answer to everything isn’t Ann Lucas in a mask.

No but a general “drop the NDA” leaves them the caterers to hide behind because of commercial sensitivity (and I wasn’t going to do this but fuck it as you’re on my case again: which is exactly what I said before this broke and got shit on here because I didn’t believe the council were the third...

Seriously? What would you like me to stop? Stating the facts as are known and not engaging in childish frothing about things I’ve invented in my head? No, shan’t. I’ve repeatedly stated i work from the assumption no one is outright lying and go from what we know not what we think. You carry on...

Again. Take it up with the people making the argument. I’m just reporting the judges reasoning. The original point was in support of the idea that Wasps essentially got a freehold. That was what I was replying to.

I think they’ll do everything to avoid that. Whether we’ll need one is another question.

Same as the Corbyn target practice over here was it last year? Silly really and you’d hope someone with some sense would step in even if they didn’t agree, just from a PR POV.

Just leaves the caterers doesn’t it? I hope they’re being asked to just drop the bit about the indemnity and not the commercial details.

Jim Gordon! Might be able to get to the bottom of this!

Think the minutes will go up here:Sky Blue Trust - Meeting Minutes IIRC they have to publish them according to their constitution. Nothing since December though.

We’re talking about a hybrid model apparently. No idea how that’s supposed to work. Did you guys get consulted on which days or just told when you be in?

So, exactly how many office landlords are Tory donors then? So weird this obsession they have with everyone being in the office.

Well on the one hand clearly all the Twitter ITKs were wrong about him signing today. On the other hand:

What indemnity between Wasps and CCC? The one that broke down negotiations? That’s between Sisu and Wasps. CCC have explicitly said they didn’t ask for it. As I said, I’m assuming until proven otherwise that no one is outright lying here. Wasps could easily see that indemnity as required for...