Search results

Would be good for any meeting with Wasps to go into depth on what risks they see from letting CCFC play on a short term deal or is it purely leverage?

She had just said you deserve a Nobel Prize so understandable :P

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p08mldq8 3:40 for Pete ;)

If you ask me to put my most positive hat on, I think the most likely route is still tugging the heartstrings of Wasps and saying “Look, Sisu are cunts and will continue to be cunts, CCFC playing at the Ricoh temporarily will change nothing. So for the fans, just let us play there on a short...

No one is asking the club to indemnify the state aid case.

The legal action is purely designed to distress ACL *alwyashasbeen.jpg* And that’s why it won’t be dropped.

Lots of people on here believe the council is making Wasps ask for the indemnity.

No one is lying. Wasps want Sisu to promise not to take any more legal action against the council. They have agreed to Sisus offer of not needing indemnity against future legal action against Wasps.

Agree with all of that. I don’t think she’ll liquidate as you say, but it is my biggest fear. More likely we fail to compete and find ourselves back in L1 and maybe she sells up? As NW says though, what value “looking tough” I don’t know. I can’t see us realistically being at Brum for five...

And we’re back at square one. Sisu don’t have to go anywhere, just give up the wild goose chase. Wasps have to ignore the wild goose chase and accept the costs of defending it will happen anyway. Either would remove the logjam. Only one side is responsible for CCFC over Wasps though and in...

Mate, you know my thoughts on this. They’re unchanged for years: there’s nothing we can do while Sisu think there’s a chance of a legal action working and Wasps think there’s a chance of stopping them. Best case is Wasps be the bigger person and let us play there while Sisu are trying to...

Also we returned on a short term deal and explicitly said we won’t be staying so the impact on the valuation would’ve likely been negligible.

Im half joking. I think it’s just emotive language designed to do exactly what it did which is get people up in arms and create a lot of heat and no light. Look at how this place reacted, believing that Wasps were asking Sisu to pay the costs of the state aid case, which was clearly never true...

If you’ll allow me some snark: Because if Joy can’t use it as a vehicle to get the Ricoh she’ll liquidate it?

Awaits the howls of council plant. (This is literally what I’ve been saying on here for months)

Did you ask about the new ground at all? Everything I’m hearing is we aren’t coming back any time soon.

There are no further claims to European courts if this fails. Best guess is it would be civil action which would need to be brought by Sisu as the “injured party”.

Hi Pete, can you answer my post? What do you feel needs to change about the offer from Wasps to make it not “impossible to agree to”?

There goes Balotelli.

What about the current deal do you think makes it impossible to sign from your conversations so far? What is it Wasps need to change about it? Did you ask about CCC not just not asking for indemnity but not needing it at all?