Search results

I agree. Do think some people don't want us to go back to the Ricoh though, which I find rather odd. For me it's a great stadium and only cold and soulless because of the lack of success on the pitch. I do think we should all want all 3 of the above.

There you go. Corrected it for you.

Well the capacity is usually 7,500, but that is being reduced while they carry out some expansion work to the ground, so am guessing with the capacity reduced, Tim will predict something like 10,000. :whistle:

As I say, even if the lad had 'seen' the incident, the police just accepted his story without question and went back off to try and arrest the John Simm character. Very disappointing after such a bright start. Did you also notice that all the main protaganists in the programme were 'troubled...

What a fab idea. Stroke of genius! Knock down the Ricoh and let Sisu build a new stadium on the land. Would that be in Coventry or not? :thinking about: If not within the boundary, I have to say I would refuse to go.

I do think they may very well knock down the Ricoh. Perhaps they could stick up a disused gas works and then contaminate the land again. :facepalm:

Was very disappointed myself, Nick. After a gritty, realistic start from the first 2 episodes, the final part seemed to get rather silly I felt, with people suddenly spilling the beans left right and centre for no particualr reason and it all pushing the bounds of realism to the extreme. I...

It's a fab cast to be honest. Not a weak link. Beautifully played out.

Damien Hurst getting a hat trick and Andy Peters bagging the other?

Brazil or Argentina to win it. England to make the quarter finals and be knocked out on penalties or by the Bum of God.

Man U's equivilent of Julian Darby.

I'm writing to my MP. How very dare they!

Just stop him from making any more records, then we'll all be happy.

Think the climate over there may well have influenced the decision to be honest, what with his age etc. Plus he hasn't been getting much game time has he.

But it's their identity too. If they had simply stolen our nickname then I think we'd have a genuine grievance, but they have been playing in sky blue and exclusively sky blue for welll over a hundred years.

Cos he's a scaredy cat and the other bloke was bigger and even more intimidating? I too wondered about the car, but I just put it down to Lester being a bit of a coward, really scared and just wanting to get out of there as quickly as he could. It would also mean his having to get the car keys...

I don't know why we are even having this argument to be honest. Manchester City have been playing exclusively in sky blue for well over 100 years. No idea why people are getting so het up over it.

Tis so. Coventry City sky blue kits ; 1889 then 1891 then 1898 then 1906-1907 then 1910-1922 then not again until 1962 Manchester City Sky Blue kits; 1890 then 1894 all the way through to 2014. They have been the Sky Blues for a lot longer than us. Yes, the are the Citizens...

I don't think they have the name copywrited to be honest. It's like if you have a friend Dave. Other people are allowed to have friends called Dave, too. Man City have been the Sky Blues an awful lot longer than us. http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Manchester_City/Manchester_City.htm

Manchester City have had a sky blue kit ever since 1890 and the Sky Blues has always been one of their nicknames. Why so angry?