Search results

Still, people seem very confused by this. It means the rugby club is going nowhere

They have a sub lease why does no one understand that?

Why would anyone want them back in London - the training centre is here and they have a sub lease on a low rent I would guess

no the holding company does

The rugby club is not likely to go anywhere - it has a 50 year sub lease

She is worse - she’s ridiculous

Well if the sold it for market value the rugby element is then viable isn’t it?

The 250 lease will mean funding is achieved - the real outrage would be if a sale could be agreed at the asset value and wasps then have a 50 year sub Lease and money in the bank

I base it on the fact that last season wasps went to the final and gates then declined this season. The “buzz” the media and Wasps PR created has long faded I know you’ve said it doesn’t have an impact on Coventry Rugby Club but to attract more support it would have to. We must be the only...

https://amp.lbc.co.uk/news/keir-starmer-says-vast-majority-of-women-dont-have-a-penis-and-need-safe-spaces/

The correlation with on field results and attendance doesn’t really exist in rugby - wasps were finalists last year but attendances remain low and decreasing

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/stella-creasy-jk-rowling-wrong-woman-can-have-penis/

He’s dreadful being popular in wales is hardly difficult

Does Rachel Reeves ever answer a single question

This place is mental https://www.autoevolution.com/news/death-after-nuerburgring-pileup-raises-questions-on-safety-during-weekdays-171099.html

The crowd argument is irrelevant and I’d assume you have to have an accurate measure of tickets sold for customs and excise The business itself is the issue. It’s failed miserably on its objectives, the bond scheme has failed and crucially it’s treated bond holders who’ve funded the business...

The issue is though rugby is a fairly limited sport for financial backing of that magnitude - it doesn’t have global brand appeal

No business does unless it has a backer than can constantly fund such losses

I don’t think it’s to the detriment of the football club in truth now

Unless something changed though it’s totally unsustainable The loan has always been the Achilles heel. The funding debt has got worse - Richardson is owed more money - and losses are averaging £10 million a year It’s now admitted renewed funding has to be from more than one source and the...