Search results

Wonder if we are indeed interested in someone else, as alluded to by Hooi, but that if that then falls through we would go back in for him. Is that possible? TM did say he liked him during his trial.

Considering it is a 10 hr long show I would have to say giving it 10 mins is not really giving it a go at all. The whole case really here is the murder case, not the rape case. Think there is one episode of the rape case and nine episodes of the murder case. Stick with it for two episodes...

It's a fair point. Tudgay is a little slow and though he holds the ball up well, he just doens't score enough. MAF is very slow too and not a natural goalscorer. Two fast young kids wouldn't be a bad call, but at the same time you wouldn't really want to be throwing them on when we're 2 goals...

He pulled down his trousers and flashed his tackle? What a dick.

No! Outside now! Choose your weapon!

Who, Clarkson?

Rose confuses me because his game on the face of it just doesn't suit the way we play. Would be very surprised to see TM pick Vincelot and Fleck and Rose in the same team. Rose is a box to box midfielder, so not the DM Vincelot is and not the sitting playmaker Fleck is. Get the feeling if Rose...

Never ever heard of anyone calling Stephen Fry obnoxious before. Bit of a shock that. Jeremy Clarkson, yes, but not Stephen Fry. A man who speaks with great knowledge, but also manifests an enormous amount of compassion in what he says too. That's Fry of course, not Clarkson.

Seriously? Wow! I see him as a national teasure. Clever, witty, a great orator, a writer, an actor, a comic and someone who has worked really hard for charities over many years. The guy is incredibly intelligent and has a good heart too. What is obnoxious about him?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-d4otHE-YI

Besides, just listen to Stephen Fry talking about God! Bloody brilliant stuff!

Well yep, tend to agree. In my book Bigi ain't no defensive midfielder. I really can't see what role he can fill. If I remember rightly, last time he was here didn't we end up playing him wide midfield?

Yep! Exactly. Anyone who watched the Big Questions yesterday would have seen this very argument. Like one 'expert' was talking about Christians and another piped up and said 'Is that the Anglican Christians in this country that have accepted gay marriage' or the African Anglican Christians that...

Not writing them off. Just not too worried about them. Let them play them, see how they get on and then look at how far in front or behind we are.

As I said on another thread, I just can't see how he would fit in anywhere for us.

There's such small margins for error in passing the ball from the back. Further up the pitch I think would much more suit him.

But then Burton play at Peterborough tomorrow. They can't both win. Next Tuesday Walsall are away at Doncaster, which could prove to be a very difficult game. I am not too concerned about games in hand personally.

Yep, we need barricades not baritones.

Most of us don't constantly give him shit. When he plays well we praise him and when he plays badly, like the last two games he featured in, then we rightly criticise him. I like him, but the last two games he featured in it was almost like playing with 10 men at times. He was very, very poor...

The players are fitter. No doubt about it. Not just talking about quick off the mark, talking about sustained pace over a substantial part of the game. George Best could be very, very lazy and he wasn't fit a lot of the time, something he has admitted to himself. The game is faster today than...