Search results

Shes not going to be the leader is she? That’s like saying IDS could beat dicky Burgon - it’s a senseless comparison “a very capable orator” Christ he’s no Neil Kinnock is he

Is that showing a negative impact after removing Mr Johnson?

Id imagine they’d lose a lot of sleep coming across hard man Starmer at the dispatch box

he looks like he’s looking at Starmer in the mirror

What a man

Why mention Eton if it’s not? Also if it’s prime aim is not to save money what is it?

But that’s not the point is it if they choose to spend every penny on bettering their children it’s a real positive surely. Sorry this is a Rwanda style headline grab from Starmer - it’s envy politics- an us and then mentality and a case of let’s have a race to the bottom of the education...

Or they decide to put their disposable income into it. I know 4 people from council houses who do it and one who sold their house and downsized massively to raise cash

I cashef in my endowment and re mortgaged

again irrelevant as I’ve said to nW - if it closed it closed

It’s very true in the type of schools I’m referring to and applies to most at the Coventry based schools

But if he was in it now it could close if the fee payers couldn’t pay at the school? What’s his plan on grammer? Is selection ok then?

Average being the word. Was t it over 25% at one point on page 21? Do you think the average parent at bablake has £100,000 disposable income? You really think that. If that’s an average some will be 30% to 50% - doesn’t it also imply around 1 third of parents use other funds unfortunately...

it’s a typical headline grab mentioning Eton and failing to mention schools like - well Mr Starmer himself attended the ex grammar schools that make up a large proportion of these schools comprise largely of people who are not affluent and don’t have pockets of cash but have committed to it...

what percentage of disposable income is shown on page 21 of the report?

What percentage of disposable income is quoted? Also is it 6-8 years out of date?

On page 21 of that same report - I sssume it’s the same and not updated so it’s 6 years ago it says something else in reality doesn’t it?

Most are average middle class with no other disposable income

That’s the point some study I read somewhere said it would generally mean about 400,000 extra places in comprehensive education and cost far more than it saves

this is clearly though a scheme to be aimed at all schools in the private sector then I would assume