Search results

Reckon he's taken the £8.4M. owed to Arvo and somehow transposed it across both parties.

Are we sure we fully understand the new System . While the payment bands sound derisory ,IIRC ,they relate to payments for batches of games played by the young player . It is complex though and I may have got it wrong.:thinking about::facepalm:

The Cynic in me says its of no consequence in the overall scheme of continued ownership via SISU. Yeilding fourth Div football in a ground 20-30 miles from our fair City,holding around 6000 fans ,matching their ambition for our Club, to be self sufficient, ney even profitable and rewarding the...

what is going on here !! Campbell raising good points on Newsnight. My view on the media and beeb lambasting the negative stance of the ambivilant and downright outraged who will dance on her grave, are that the lot in now are drawing a total parallel to her reign, and are potentially worried...

i'd wager no on the grounds of not recognising CCFC Holdings as an ongoing ,functioning company .

In the Balcony (Prawn Sandwich) or block 15-16:thinking about:

HMMM,an Americanism ,wonder if Old Grendy has been Stateside lately ??

Because they wer'nt payin the rent and it was a whip to beat ACL with :facepalm:

Its all fairly straight forward then Torch ,two parties trying to establish a legal standpoint outside of court ,its all about perception ,we all need to stay cool asin around 4 weeks a decision will be made ,this is just a poorly played game of Chess.

I believe in response to an Attempt by SISU to suggest a resumption of Negotiation re; Arent agreement for next Season Tony . I'd say they're around 6 months behind the curve here ,and most of this posturing from both parties is about establishing whether CCFC Holdings LTD has any Legitimate...

Its a response Statement.

Are'nt we all friends torch All City Fans:thinking about:

Probably courtesy of brinner ,a residue left over from the SOC days,have had them taken off us at one away game this season.:mad:

I fear the length of contract is another SISU act of Spite while under threat ,much as David Bells was . Done purely as a Barrier to Hostile Takeover ,of no benefit to or for the Club.

As OSB has stated many ,many times it may not be necessary to lock stock and Barrel ,yet still achieve good income without the oulay. Personally at some point i would like the club to have it all ,puerly for the Connection we all crave ,I think it will come in the future ,after some proving...

IT would'nt take £70M.

As were crossing over on two threads ,the 2yr thing does seem irrelevent as higgs will possibly part with their share to the right party at an attractive rate .The need to purchase the whole thing has been proven to not be entirely necessary for the club to benfit from significant revenue...

Don't think so Tony,IIRC it was for 10 yrs from move in ,2 yrs left I think.

Confusing Pax. So its Elliott + Hoffman out to line their own pockets?? The right to buy the Higgs share in ACL is not exclusively available to the Club ,anyone who wants to buy it can if they meet Higgs valuation. The only privelidge the Club had from Higgs was that for a set period it was...