Search results

1, You can always, always find a new scapegoat. They are more abundant than Eastern European's with scrap vans. 2. Is that a metaphor for who is going to 'sort his missus out?'

Fine, enough about your sex life, but what about the City's defending and the right way to solve this ongoing problem?

I think if the fanbase attending 'home' games stays low then something will have to give and will give.

May be City till July? :thinking about::confused:

Is that a new twist on the old City song favourite? 'I'm City till July, I'm City till July, I know I am, I'm sure I am, I'm City till July. '

As he's a Coventry City manager we should probably give him 3 games.

Which is why I wouldn't advocate it as a global policy. I would be looking to target a few 'home' games for non-attendance. On non-attendance days we should drive around Coventry in convoy at 10 mph bringing traffic around the city centre to a standstill.

Well that's it. From a publicity point of view it would really get notice and keep the pot boiling if no fans turned up at all. And if the owners were receiving just about no revenue at all then I believe that would have a really big impact. The club have budgeted for a loss. They will not have...

First I've heard of it too. When were we deducted 10 points? Maybe I was on holiday.

Having just watched the highlights, it is quite clear that Jordan Clarke should be burnt, flipped over, toasted on the other side, hung, drawn, quartered, shot, boiled in oil, chopped into little pieces and then posted to his mother in several little parcels, ears first. We need a scapegoat and...

Surely 'off course' would be outside the ground wouldn't it?

You're right. It was away and it was a deflection.

Some people would call Tim Fisher a 'strange experiment' to be quite honest.

Moribund? Is he the full back who played in that League Cup match back in 69?

I still remember him saying that though NW. I clearly remember him saying it when asked the question at one of the forums or on CWR. He said he didn't know exactly who would be owning the stadium, but that CCFC would be paying rent.

It's a madness. something I've said many times. Moving from a Premiership quality stadium, which is ready to go, to a new stadium that has to be planned, designed and built and that will be further away, cheaper standard and of a much lower capacity. If we were to own the new stadium then...

You do know you can get into a lot of trouble for putting someone's address up on the internet don't you? Good job you refrained from dislcosing the house number isn't it! Think on next time.

Yep, as has been admitted by Fisher himself in his own words, CCFC will not own any new ground. They will pay rent.

Think all our deals are messi deals aren't they?

Is that a metaphor for a 'bumming?':o