Search results

I'd agree to a point ,Im no fan of the capitalist system Etc,and it would be easy for all the altruistic notions of equality ...Fairness ....Morality .....to condemn the West for its maruading around the globe ,but reality would dictate we have to have secure access to resources for our...

I'd be guessing but £10-£12M. thats around how much they say has been put in by them ,i'd confidently say half of that is genuine.

Can only assume it was last summer along with the late books??

It does make you worry about that Third party ownership element . How will the league deal on that,is it their error ? Were they fooled ,Incompitent? so brush it aside?

Its a possibility is'nt it.

They have to prove beneficial ownership first Surely Greggo??

would they know that they were going to be Complicit in a scam to outwit a council and charity in a wrangle over a legally binding lease.:confused:

The estimated value of Arvo's input IMO ,that would represent a gain for SISU .

And surely the FL will/do take a dim view of being Used /duped in this charade as would a judge .....................Maybe Administrator??:(

There were rumours i heard a few weeks back that suggested they had been involved,over youth players though.

Interesting ...........To pay Saleries maybe?? What other assets were in LTD that the Administrator could sell?:confused:

Sounds like a recent change last summer possibly??

NO i think they assert rights over name ,ticket sales etc .:):confused:

The words Benficial which are capable of being challenged in court and the word assert imply vagueries Stu,the main surprise for me is player registrations ,which its possible were only shifted last summer,all still open to question.

Should come cheaply as it would'nt exactly benefit them once control of club is lost.

Am convinced late books etc have been exactly for this purpose .

He did say last week that was a possibility and TF's rantings were basically an assertion.

I Don't know the answer to that but maybe they did'nt really have the funds ,there was really very little what we could call positive investment ,they took a very short stab at it and have wasted what £25M propping up losses ince and at the outset.

Excellent post RP ,there are indeed shadows back in the 90's they may even be political,but have to disagree about being sold a pup as they got the shares for free . Now if they'd payed for them??

It does say they assert the right to the name ,Ticket selling ETC ,but it looks lik the registrations are in Holdings which is unexpected as will be witht he Academy I assume.