Search results

Not looked back on this thread or the goals yet, but did anyone think the linesman bottled calling a foul/offside for their goal? Not saying he should have, as not looked back, but he didn’t run back to the halfway line and seemed to want to speak to the ref and appear to just give up.

SBT, you wait here while Saddlebrains tries to talk some sense into this raving derelict (sees tweets) slow…slow down…….who’s been stealing your thoughts?

Don't know Bunting? I hit the ceiling when I saw endorse our signing

Whilst there were many fictions depicted in the film, but I hate Darkest Hour portraying Elizabeth Layton as Winston Churchill's secretary in 1940. I know there was quite a bit of artistic license during this film, but annoys the fuck out of me for some reason

Should see Leeds fans and Rutter, although he was one of the best players in the league last season, I take it as a good sign.

Straight from the local 'Spoons

Prefer to keep DK, if we can, to be fair

Not even SBC fodder, fucking hell

Nah mate, we're all just killing time waiting for the missus to finish up on the loo

The fact they mentioned late winners scored in the official press release means we are planning on scoring every winning goal 90+ and appointing a world-renowned cardiologist to keep an eye on MR. Another DK mega-strategy

He was talking about Norman Cantor, to be fair

Not going to lie. We're going up, aren't we?

He apparently also called Sakamoto's signature move the "Chernobyl Chop" off camera

Or a liquorice rip-off

It's amazing how I have not actually had sympathy for the proponents of eugenics until now

Some people need to ask themselves if they did Fleetwood away on a weekday night in the middle of winter in two successive seasons, just to see us lose 3-0, with Chaplin missing a penalty, one season and then a bore 0-0 draw the next, before commenting on priority fairness!

I'm more concerned if it is true that Kevin Friend declared two teams... :sick: You can't support two teams, god damn it!

She'd still be old enough to know right from wrong, plus, how can you say she was definitely brainwashed? I am not saying I disagree, I just think we should remain open-minded, hence why I think she should come back to face the courts if found to have violated the law.

Yeah, I get that, but there is a reason why the criminal age of responsibility is 10 years old, you should know right from wrong by that age. I do agree that she may well have been easily influenced, but I am not completely sold that she was just brainwashed and therefore bares no...