Search results

Saw mentioned someone, possibly on here, that it might be Cov Uni land at Warwick Uni but surely Cov Uni (and Warwick Uni for that matter) would be pretty keen to stay on good terms with the CCC?

I'm not going to stand on the hill every week but if the talk of a protest there at the Sky game comes good I will certainly be there for that game. Feel it's a bit off to critise people for going to Northampton and protesting, people feel the need to do something and should be free to do that...

wonder how much advertising hoardings cost at NTFC?

How many people used to end up in Lancaster for what is now Cov Uni?

I'd bloody love to see Fisher in court trying to prove all the crap he's come out with has been true. Fighting fund for bigfatronssba wouldn't be short of donations for sure.

There's a couple in the telegraph tonight. Rugby council say they know nothing about anything happening at Brandon and Warwick Uni say they know nothing about anything up there. And of course before Tim's time here but there was the classic unveiling of 'the greatest board ever assembled' with...

obviously I'd like everything to work out well for CCFC but imagine if Tim builds his stadium outside of Coventry and still only has a few hundred people turning up. Think what the interview on CWR the next day would be like!

easy way is for the telegraph to ask them all, some will give a no, some may give a yes and some my give a no comment. If you're looking at 3 sites you only need one more no on top of Rugby and you have your 3.

well Rugby council say they've heard nothing so thats Brandon off the list.

It's quite comical really how often something comes out from the SISU side and is shortly followed by any other party involved going don't know anything about that! So basically, we were going to tell you where the stadium was weeks ago but all the important people in a multi million pound...

Said this a while back that some people might go to a game for the 'novelty factor'. Of course persuading people to go to one game on that basis is a lot different to persuading them to go every week.

you mean something like you can't move more than 30 miles away and it must be in the West Midlands :whistle:

they've already done that with Ltd and the FL have now set a precedent by allowing the share to be issued to a new company rather than one which buys the old company out of administration. So lets say SISU liquidate someone such as PH4 could say I'll buy the assets from liquidation (player...

there's some great stuff in the Daily Mail article (there's a sentence I never thought I'd type!): "To appease the fans, the club have laid on a coach from Pool Meadow bus station in Coventry to take them the 34 miles to their new home and eventually the Army, which resembles little more than a...

This is true but if they had followed their own rules they would have refused the club permission to play outside the city. If they had done that where do you think we'd be playing?

Assuming you talking about buying everything Higgs will just want out what they put in and be glad to be out of it I'd think. From the council point of view the starting point would be paying off the loan and then covering whatever they've put in to the project. Anything from there up to market...

It was actually a tweet from the club that set me thinking. Something about MOTM chosen by matchday sponsor HWD Solutions.

that's kind of my point. If NOPM is about starving SISU of income therefore you would assume you would not want businesses putting money into them. The way to achieve that is to make sure there is no ROI on that investment and if anything they lose business and get negative publicity.

Won't all the rent from the casino etc go to ACL in which case you're valuing the lease at around 4 times what ACL originally paid for it! Given that there is a lease the value of the freehold wouldn't take into account any income other than from that lease would it which CCC have already had I...

would it be that much? the value of ACL would be based on turnover / P&L. The value of the land itself was quite low wasn't it and as long as a buyer had a long lease would they need the freehold? I believe there's a council report that says the freehold's not actually worth that much as ACL...