Search results

I think the Tory side will oppose any further assistance

Well he is managing Dereks risks thats for sure

So it seems Mr Richardson has sold the shares to a chap who shares the same name as this fellow https://www.wasps.co.uk/news/christopher-holland-joins-wasps-board-as-non-executive-director/

Well let’s hope so. It now appears Mr Richardson has sold his shareholdings in the training ground…on the day of the bond defaulting

But your analysis on the lease sale is nonsense

Thet wouldn’t have been allowed to sell the head lease for development purposes It wasn’t worth any money at the point of sale anyway

Who knows? Someone has suggested to me the Huddersfield game may be on

No one has said should its a case of what is best for revenue mitigation - if its £100k we have already lost more by not paying it - from a cost perspective we are worse off The irony is most of the people adamant Wasps are going bust soon don't accept in that instance we'd be paying anyway as...

People are fixating on the £500k far too much - the option of repair is far cheaper

The figure for repairs is clearly far less than that

We'd only end up having another landlord anyway as we are unlikely to be buying it

There is little point in continuing this discussion

If we have to sell him it is not to repair the pitch but we are about to have 3 games with zero cash coming in

If they go under it wouldn't be their pitch - the administrator will only look at future ougoings - and frankly you are started to sound like The Judgement of Solomon There is no evidence a new pitch is needed but a repair for now anyway so the figure is a lot less. You still have not said...

We are sub tenants and will be bringing income in so we will be protected to play there - even then though it would not be that straightforward Richardson is also far from stupid and will not just surrender the Head Lease so this really is a developing potential crises if they are going to...

My point is the pitch is not playable - if a receiver is appointed who is making it playable while a very lengthy legal process then takes place? I have no idea if we pay for the policing, refreshment staff etc or Wasps do - if its the latter and a receiver is appointed how is that working...

Not how admin works I am afraid

If Wasps go bust perhaps you would like to explain how when a receiver takes it over any repairs to a pitch would take place - who would authorise it and who would pay for it? We would have to put everything through a receiver.

Its safe to say the plan has not worked well though has it and the taxpayer for Wasps to have a remote chance of survival will be getting a far bigger bail out soon

It was 14 minute matches not full matches No one would be able to do a thing if receivers are appointed as everything would go through them and the indicators are red flags everywhere for Wasps - its a big issue that no one seems to consider