Search results

Who weren't in the room at the time. All they can testify is what we know i.e Evans turned up later than MacDonald and then triedto leave earlier through a fire escape.

Always been traumatised by Pens

Evans team aren't gonna say "We got now chance but hey if you got to be in it to win it" They were "very confident" they would win the first appeal and didn't.

So you have to be a statistician to decide that it is more likely he is guilty and will remain so? FFS Samo have a word wit yourself

And in the balance of probabilities will remain so.

Otis I've pointed out the facts behind the case. As it is unlikely to be a new witness and DNA is not a option it's either third party testimony or due process.

So prove me wrong Samo, I dare ya

No just not stupid

You seem to have as much of a grasp of Irony as Alanis Morrisette

Appeals are granted for new evidence or failure of process. As the case was simple i.e Evans testified he had sex with a girl too drunk to give consent and MacDonald backed this statement up. The fact the didn't know this was a crime has no baring on the case. As the were only three people...

Figure of speech Free of conviction

So a granted appeal automatically means you are inncoent? Are you really this stupid Samo?

Who is denying a second appeal is taking place?

The actual figure for the year is 9 granted 10 rejected for criminal case appeals.

Black or white? No you doofus Ched Evans admitted he slept with a girl without consent and that is rape under English and Welsh law. Not balck or white just rape.

As stated it could be a technicality. The 3% figure guven for appeal request success. In the last available full year figures the supreme court granted 9% leaves of appeal and turned down 10.

Said that before and the court of appeals quickly said no. The new evidence could simply be a technicality that the court of appeal will decide played no part in influencing the decision. There are a lot of people who want a convicted rapist who admitted he slept with a girl without consent to...

We know what happened that night as MacDonald and Evans testified. If they told the truth in court Evans raped the girl. It's simple really.

It's already been appealed once and failed and as the main evidence for conviction was Evans testimony unless there is a new witness there isn't really anything that can see an appeal succeed. Evans pretty much confessed to rape.

That makes it okay then Nick FFS