They were offered reduced terms down to £400K. with added Income streams that would have effectively negated the rent to £250K. and walked away ,they do have Matchday costs to factor In of around £10K. per match but they would be liable for some level of those at any ground
but that is exactly what they did when funding the gap through the Construction phase ,with a divided Council and being very careful around the rules governing the area around the current argument ,what is different?
Going to go slightly off Topic here or not as the case may be.
We've covered this in Minute detail and we're all well aware something Is not right with the way this has unfolded. How can you claim Beneficial Ownership without the entity claiming that point not being considered to be in Admin...
For the amount of you all out there ,surely they can stick you in training gear and take you in as part of the Backroom for the Behind closed doors game.
Those who know me personally say I am, my ex went as far to refer to me as Saint Ray ,unfortunately it was a title I just couldn't live up to ,to my dismay,
The Juggernaught rumbles on .what has been evident all along Is that It has been batted away by the FL and PA, Leaving it Parked at the door of ACL any challenge to come from ACL or any interested Purchaser ,Will they go for It??