Search results

Let me try to recalibrate you.. on another thread Grendel wrote: My view is they(SISU) are going to do nothing for a year and see if that has been sufficient to close down ACL. If not then two choices - closure or build the ground with the former being most likely. ....and against the...

So you agree then... distress ACL in the hope of Ricoh acquisition or close the football club down... so the hidden agenda is accepted?

But why can they not remain at the Ricoh on a negotiated reduced rent agreement, and whilst this is not factually known, all press reports suggest ACL were prepared to talk and a figure of 400,000 broadly assumed, which lessens the tightness of the ever decreasing circle whilst plans for the...

Agree- so demonstrate the investment?

But even more likely to fail when tenants dont pay bills?

as ever you ignore the question with some vague response, and a redirection. "The losses may be less... " well thats a start I guess..... so go on tell me how mitigating losses short term is a bad thing? Or do your pockets have holes that you occassionaly repair before promising to buy yourself...

Please dont put words into my mouth at no point have I even suggested that I do not recognise the current business structure around CCFC is unsustainable I acknowledge that the club is not viable against the current cost base- the evidence is clear and has been for time, before SISU. But they...

But in this case losses are avoidable- do you not agree?

Short term Death.....? So SISU(Otium) were kicked out of the Ricoh then is what you are saying? Of course there was an option, to swallow their pride, continue to play at the Ricoh whilst their plans for a new stadium with access to all revenue streams matured- if indeed that was/is their true...

Too technical for me to understand- sorry.... and like in my original post I accept I am not an accountant- but simplictically- whilst accepting your point about the long term sustainability of the club i.e must see revenue from other income streams- tell me in simple plain laymans English how...

OK Goals just been on... and now time for the reveal of the Conundrum-given nobody wants to play :( The answer is: SISU OUT.... * I'll get my coat.......:pointlaugh:

Apologies- you seem to argue with your own logic in agreeing that moving from the Ricoh in the short term is actually a bad idea.... *Edit please read post 99

Grendel? You did ask...:whistle:

Actually he's usually worse than that... for him I thought he was more even today than previous.

I will be going to an away game soon-with my 13 year old son ... maybe Port Vale maybe Stevenage with a spare two seats in my car... I'll take you...no petrol money required... problem solved.

Come on its not that hard... and no its not a metaphor for TF... although..:whistle:

I do but wont... not in Northampton

Sorry maybe I'm thick... please explain what sensible business plan actually accepts uneccessary loss over 1,2 3 -5 years when it is totally avoidable? Sorry if its the umpteenth time +1

Not another Judicial Review.....?