Search results

Yep. Spot on.

Agree with much of that Nick. Don't understand why someone would say 'Oh, it's Yeovil today, I'm not going, but the next game is Walsall, I'm well up for that!' Surely we should go because we want to watch Coventry City play shouldn't we? Could understand it a little more if it was Birmingham...

I am based in the sunny, delightful county of Keresleyshire.

Quite a simple answer to that. Haynes was targeted as a danger by Yeovil, so they spent the game denying him space and crowding him out. Therefore a lot of stuff came down our right hand side. You may not have noticed, but when the ball went out to Clarke on the right hand side he got very...

Nope. Not saying that, Saying that he doesn't particularly excel at any of those things. You don't see him spraying the ball around the park or him dribbling past players, or putting great crosses in, that's not his game. He does a lot of the simple things though and they can go by unnoticed by...

Tell me about it! This is my wife

Do think he could have handed out one or two cards, but overall I didn't think he was too bad.

Well I didn't think it was a pen either. Think he was looking for it.

I have a theory on the Thomas dislike if you want to hear it. Many supporters look for the following sorts of traits in a player to get them salivating. The following traits are eyecatching and exciting to watch. 1. 40 yard defence splitting passes. 2. Crunching tackles 3. Silky skills 4...

I agree on McQuoid. Ran around a lot and worked hard but offered nothing. Thought Jackson put in a much superior performance and was much more dangerous and threatening.

For once, RFC, I agree with you.

Well I didn't think Thomas played well today. Thought he was much better against Gillingham. First half in that game he totally controlled the midfield. Today was a more workmanlike performance. Haynes made over 20 misplaced passes? Seriously? We must have been at a different game then. I may...

Interesting. What did Haynes do that was poor may I ask? Thought Yeovil set out to try to mark him out the game and crowd him out and to a large degree that worked. Defensively though I felt he was very sound and even though he wasn't much of a threat going forwards I don't recall him missing...

Why, did he have a couple of pork pies tucked down his socks?

Buth then maybe I am measuring by degrees of shittyness.

Interesting. I thought he had a good game overall and kept the game flowing well. He did miss a few fouls here and there, but by a long chalk he wasn't that bad I feel.

Really? that just surprise me a little. Cannot see any resemblence in the style of play between the two. Would say the only thing they have in common is a very good engine and that they are box to box players. O'Brien for me is a much silkier, intelligent sort of player to Tabb, is more skilful...

Waggott said they reverted to that in the end after things had been going very slow previously.

Put them on the match thread, but will stick them here too. Well, I would mark it thus..... Allsop - 6. Not too much to do really and couldn't be faulted for their goal Clarke - 7. Got forwards well and broke up play on a number of occasions. A bit of sloppy passing and distribution here...

Well, I would mark it thus..... Allsop - 6. Not too much to do really and couldn't be faulted for their goal Clarke - 7. Got forwards well and broke up play on a number of occasions. A bit of sloppy passing and distribution here and there but overall I thought he had a strong game and only...