Search results

Exactly...

Thats life I guess Andy- everyone remembers when you're wrong but selective amnesia is prevalent when you're on the money- it's the law?

Why is it different- sorry? If I read you right- the inference was that those who buy a ticket from MK are hypocrits- propping up a Franchise.. I agree CCFC are not a Franchise -yet!! (god forbid)- equally those that attend are entitled to the hypocrisy of not wanting to go- but going non the...

Its all hypothetical G- and subject to good old football debate(how refeshing)... ultimately only one fact- we will never ever know?

Isn't the apparent hypocrisy you infer also found in those that attend Sixfields(although not wanting to) because it is their right to do so... so a twice over hypocritical fan ban base then- flog 'em all with the birch I say?

Here was me thinking footy was a team sport.. :whistle:

Are you thinkin' what I think you is thinkin'.. I guess that's NOPM to Mr Winkleman ;)

Thanks- nearly sulked when there, as first viewed, weren't any... read your post and it gave me the clue I needed....now got 2 secured for me and the boy... Looking forward to it.

And yet some only challenge one side?

Whilst you're pondering on the techinicalities of legality- dont forget to also consider this-as read the only illeagal act(proven by law) in this whole sorry affair. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/judge-throws-out-sky-blues-5667471 Here's a flavour "Mr Justice Males has...

Doesn't that song also contain.. "There are some things you cant cover up with lipstick and powder, but I heard you mention my name cant you talk any louder!!" I hope it doesnt turn into a cat fight!!!

I suspect it will be talks about having talks - and those will inevitably have to be held after the JR review- but I agree at least its the commencement of some form of communication, however tenous towards progression they might be in there sincerity at this juncture.

Where in that post does he admit that CCFC are a distant second to ACL?

:thinking about:;)

No I dont think so- so what do you want to talk about that is less devisive? What would your central forum theme be in the current climate that is not devisive?

Yep good point- so what do you want to talk about that is less devisive than ripping a football club from its city?

Thanks gents- Are these WM clubs such that membership is required or a general open door policy?

OK so I hope PWKH will answer. Irrespective... do you not think that the WILL was there from ACL but ignored by SISU/OTIUM, and thus that is a questionable position given the backdrop of circumstance?

So Grappa- to be absolutley clear- the offer as outlined by PWKH in the above mentioned quote you are clearly stating was illegal(not compliant with Insolvency rules) thus not worthy for consideration on a technical basis? What about on a goodwill basis to keep the club in Coventry?