Search results

  1. ccfc92

    Depression on sky blue talk

    Why :S I was praying we would keep them
  2. ccfc92

    scary thought....

    Like mcsheffery ;-)? I get what you mean, but you would work harder for a payrise agreed? And if you did loads of hard work, didn't get the pay rise, you'd feel like why bother? I'm not saying they are doing this (the players) it's just a thought for debate.
  3. ccfc92

    scary thought....

    Why not? Secure wages etc....
  4. ccfc92

    scary thought....

    What if Wilson, Cyrus, Clarke and others have been playing in form to put themselves in the shop window. And now a new club hasn't arose, our form will decline rapidly? :thinkingabout:
  5. ccfc92

    Will you?

    Agreed. Sisu still haven't invested in the squad. Free transfers do not count as investment!
  6. ccfc92

    Will you?

    Agreed keeping the squad together is great. But 6 years of miss management takes more than that
  7. ccfc92

    Deadline Day

    Have we had any confirmed ins or outs yet?
  8. ccfc92

    If Sky Blues want a show of force it has to be Vale

    Agreed. Was it 5k at mk dons? If so, 4.5k just up the road should be easy enough to do
  9. ccfc92

    -10

    i honestly dont know what to expect. anything more than avoiding relegation is a bonus
  10. ccfc92

    -10

    ive seen 40-1 :/ maybe the bookies think we have a chance :facepalm:
  11. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    agreed, but it would of been worth the gamble IMO, we need points on the board, now!
  12. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    We wouldn't of had this on fm would we Robo? :whistle:
  13. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    also, so what if we would of had 3 central strikers? one of them would of picked the ball up n scored, so whats the problem?
  14. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    and what are we doing now?
  15. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    and what if we had of won 2-1?
  16. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    thats the formation i would of done
  17. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    im not criticising, im just saying why was there only one change in the last few mins when we were at risk of shrewsbury winning the game
  18. ccfc92

    -10

    without being too negative, 2 points more than we should need after today IMO
  19. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    maybe Leon. or take baker off and do a 4-3-3
  20. ccfc92

    why one sub?

    fresh legs? impact? we need points. 2 points needlessly dropped today IMO
Top