Search results

It is indeed. How can you turn up for a day at a funfair and end up losing limbs? Is it speed and danger and profit over safety?

I don't know what her view is.

So, what is your point? It just seems I am not allowed to say some people who followed the case say there is cause for the conviction to be declared unsafe. I'm pretty sure it isn't just about what constitutes rape either by all accounts.

We need to sit down over a pint and I bet to a pound to a shilling we have exactly the same view on rape and what constitutes rape.

Do the Chuckle Brothers follow court cases as part of their job? NW, you are better than this. I'm not talking about any old Tom, Dick, or Harry. These are people who follow court cases as part of their jobs. This is getting totally ridiculous. And in case you are a little deaf, I BELIEVE HIM...

What's he been found guilty of? All I can reiterate is, the bloke was found guilty and I believe him to be guilty. Just some people who followed the case in court believe there is reason for the conviction to be unsafe. I didn't follow the case. Some people followed every day in court. Doesn't...

Yep. There are people who followed the case (journalists and media), who say they thought the conviction was unsafe. Apparently though you aren't supposed to mention that. Does make me laugh, cause I find I am having to defend myself even though I believe the bloke to be guilty. :D

To be fair though, Tony, he has submitted fresh 'evidence' and there will be a ruling with a few weeks or so. Then hopefully the whole thing can be put to bed once and for all. This article from yesterday. He has made a further grant for appeal...

As long as we get the players we need I am not bothered. No point moaning now and then in a couple of weeks we all suddenly go 'Oh, we have recruited well, that's alright then.' I am not worried yet. 2 weeks before the season and we still haven't recruited, then I will start to worry.

I have found on here you can't quote the defences case without being jumped up and down on, even though you don't at all believe the case yourself and are simply stating their defence. ;)

Never even had a one night stand, so I'm in the clear on this one.

I wish Sisu would re sign.

Nope. Not talking about people. I am talking about in terms of posts. The poster before was talking about guesses.

And indeed, access back into the human race.

This is Sky Blues Talk. Very little on here is educated.

I honestly meant to put tipsy. Freudian slip of the worst kind there. Sent from my LG-D405 using Tapatalk

Not going to get into an argument here, because I believe the bloke is guilty, but Evans' defence are saying that she said to the police, when interviewed, that she was sober at the time of the incident. We keep retreading the same old ground. According to his defence team they seem to have...

Anyway, I believe him to be guilty, as has been proved in a court of law Sent from my LG-D405 using Tapatalk

Not naive Stu. His defence team say they have the police report that states she said she was tipsy and not drunk. They say they atually have the police report. Sent from my LG-D405 using Tapatalk

Think the way to look at it is, she may have shown herself to not be of very good character in all this sutuation, but is STILL a victim and that is what is paramount to this sorry saga. Sent from my LG-D405 using Tapatalk