Search results

Of course there will. Jo and Tim said so. And most importantly of all, so did RFC.

Nice to know that after all this time we have suddenly got a location and a backup location.:laugh:

Fook all. they should hang their heads in shame.

If a player has been a good servant to us I always show an interest in their future careers. The ones who come and go I couldn't give two hoots about.

The Chelsea game was a strangely subdued atmosphere for the most part, I admit. But on every other occasion it has been buzzing when we have had large crowds, Middlesborough and Wolves and Blackburn and Gillingham etc.

That is rubbish. When full the Ricoh has had a fantastic atmosphere.

And this is why we are between a rock and a hard place.

If they do have a plan, it will be a Baldrick style one.

Yep. Traffic would be an absolute nightmare. I travel that route every day and it's already clogged most of the time. Anyone else think this is just the council being quite clever in expectation of a Sisu statement decalring that the new stadium has to be built so many miles away because they...

Well yep, people say we need our own stadium, but who is 'we' going to be? Seems to me that we won't own any new stadium. That seems abundantly clear. I maintain a new stadium is a nonsense. The talk is of revenues etc., but just how far down the line would this be with all the enormous costs...

I get angry everytime I hear the word successful. Also rubber dinghy as well. Unless done in an Indian accent of course.

It's the Coventry way.

Err, but West Ham are a London club. the Olympic Stadium is in London. If West Ham moved to Watford then maybe you would have a point. If City move within Coventry then no-one is going to have a problem. The whole beef with many fans is if we move to another town.

Oooh, what was that? Was it a bird? Was it a plane? No, it was my thread going off on a tangent! Why can't all this other stuff be discussed on one of the other eleventy billion threads? :whistle: All I want to know is what do people think Sisu would do if the stadium location was announced at...

I just said 6 miles, Rob. I just plucked a figure. The mileage isn't the issue I am alluding to. To get things back on topic, if the location for the new stadium was announced (wherever that may be) and fans didn't back the move and said they wouldn't attend, what would our owners do?

You are not understanding what I am saying Speedies. I am talking about the location of where the Ricoh is situated. That is not an issue for 99.9% of fans. That's the point I am making. Nowt to do with Wasps. I am just saying people are only moaning now about the location because we have been...

What are you talking about? I am talking about people approving the location of the ground. I am not talking about people not going up. Do you seriously think a lot of people don't go up because of where the Ricoh is located?

Isn't it? All I hear is that people aren't happy about the Wasps logos and that the seats may change colour. If it stayed as it was with City there permanently then it would be backed. The location isn't the issue with the Ricoh, it's the revenues and Wasps and City being demoted to a bit player.

Let's say for arguments stake Sisu come out and announce that land has been secured. They let it be known the location and then they ask fans for their views. The ground is 6 miles away. The majority of fans say they will not attend once it is built and don't support the location selected...