Is Fisher not a SISU apologist? Also, don't tend to read PWKH's posts/threads, don't particularly know who he/she is, just post my own opinion, that goes against you 5-10 posters :)
I just don't understand how SISU choosing to move away, resulting in losses, say they will fund losses, then use "bonus" money to fund these losses with no investment in the squad, is acceptable, or am I missing something?
The SISU apologists will disagree, they will say it's going to cover losses at sixfields. Even though quote TF: "we will cover losses" so surely any bonus money like Clarke and FA Cup should be for the squad no?
completely agree. watching them on SSN after signing Ozil had to be the most cringiest thing I've ever seen. "these arsenal fans have been through a lot, and they deserve this signing. They had to wait a while, but what a signing" was the quote I think (wretching)
I can see both sides of that argument. But you could also argue there wouldn't be many man u or arsenal (or any top 6/7) fans if they weren't big clubs, put them towards the bottom of the premiership and see their attendances half. But they never will be down that end as the money difference is...
with thousands of empty seats at wembley yesterday, so maybe the novelty has worn off for them? now that would be nice, to say it's okay we'll go next year lol :(
agreed, and likewise. but surely a "punt" is the other end of the scale than no ambition, and equally dangerous? it is tricky to get it right, but gradual progression is the key