Search results

Oh the queen mother, she's one for the George Floyd thread.

Plus out of the antigen testing 51k were tests not taken but "sent out" so you are looking at about 70k antigen tests undertaken. So maybe 35k people Pathetic Number of coronavirus (COVID-19) cases in the UK

Also if you look at the figures at least 44k of the tests were pillar 3 which is antibody testing i.e. testing for people who hd the virus in the past. So there has only been about 120k antigen tests carried out

not really, only 169k test which means it's only likely to be 85k people tested. that positive figure means there are still likely to be 5 to 6k community transmissions a day which is at least 50 to 60 people dead

Beginning to think that but he is a moron still. He gets confused by alphabetti spaghetti.

Thus the outside of day 1 retail figures

For everyone else who isn't a moron. Countries have adopted distances over 1m as the only real research we have into droplet spread is based on influenza and the research for that shows a higher risk of infection at 1.8m or less.

Yes but that is not the same as saying you can't reopen the economy safely. I apologise, I didn't realise you had learning disabilities.

Also social distancing is based on droplets and not aerosols which can travel a lot further

What? Are you stupid? That is not what my post was about. Can you even read? Forgive me but did you finish school?

Me stupid? You've just shown your inability to read basic English. As you have the reading comprehension of a primary school child let me break this down into crayon for you: No one knows what the safe distance for this novel coronavirus as no gold standard trials have taken place. You...

Really? It's a shambles. Businesses still don't know what is actually happening

One metre or two? The tricky science behind social distancing | WIRED UK you won't read it but the basics are no one really knows what is the best distance is as they haven't done enough research so it's economics or peoples lives.

Where have I said that? If you want to be taken seriously stop making things up. Just this morning we spoke about who it was a case of waiting a few extra months. You've either got the memory of a gold fish or are a glib and shameless liar.

Thought it was stupid to "rate" the WHO?

Good luck with that

There's nothing of the sort in there, it doesn't even say SAGE agreed to reduce the level. Dom doesn't read the things he posts

Sush facts aren't a valid source of evidence for these folk But yes California is on a knife edge as well,

Which means that at least 8000 people were being paid to do nothing.

A walking talking study in confirmation bias