Search results

  1. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Cov united are better off staying where they are IMO. Too small a club to be getting involved in stadiums. (Not that I really care about CUFC, just saying)
  2. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    The original CCFC or nothing for me.
  3. ccfc92

    sandra are u still there?

    Who will pay for this new stadium?
  4. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Will 100% be followed by a counter statement from SISU saying they are following procedures for clarifying the correct amount etc.....
  5. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Agree with the rest of your post, but didn't we get deducted points the night before the first game of the season last season?
  6. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Agreed. ACL's accounts for this year will be interesting. If they make a profit, however small, then surely the "unspoken strategy" has failed?
  7. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Could ACL not buy/run the club? Just food for thought.....
  8. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Agreed. More court action before that happens though I fear :(
  9. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    I agree, we are in a position where sitting and waiting may eventually work out as we all want, or acting and it achieves a return for CCFC. But either action (or lack of) could also see the club not exist :(
  10. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    So the FL can not really help then :(
  11. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Agreed. There's too much "we've payed this, and they haven't payed that" going on. No one knows where anyone stands. Although if ACL have not received any monies owed, they know where they stand if that makes sense?
  12. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Thanks for the reply :) My only question is: say the FL take the share, will there be players to play for CCFC? Or are their contracts tied to SISU/Otium?
  13. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Clarification on this matter would surely make the FL act?
  14. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    Exactly my worries :( Would taking the golden share also include players contracts? If not, then we don't gain any progress.
  15. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    ;) I just meant, can the FL take the golden share off SISU?
  16. ccfc92

    Acl to comment on Ricoh arena position

    secondly after fernando's question, can they do that legally? or will sisu sue?
  17. ccfc92

    Ricoh legal row costs city tax payers £500k

    I was merely quoting Fisher, who said the football club would not be effected by the legal battles. Just like they are not effected by the move away. To answer your question, I have no idea. But ccfc should not have to pay anything. Sisu should.
  18. ccfc92

    Ricoh legal row costs city tax payers £500k

    I thought SISUs legal adventures would not effect CCFCs finances?
  19. ccfc92

    Ricoh legal row costs city tax payers £500k

    The bit I laughed at was "groundbreaking scenario in law". Something to add to the sisu honors I guess. This is getting beyond a joke this scenario.
  20. ccfc92

    Cyrus...What a Silly Lad

    Maybe if no offers come in, and he stayed for one more season, we may see a vast improvement in him to attract a big move? Could work out for all parties. If he goes though, that could free up wages for 2 more players, so would be ideal for ccfc anyway, plus the compo.
Top