Search results

Well at least we agree on something. I think this could mean the end of my club which I have supported since 1966, and to be honest that is all I am bothered about

If right ( which I am sure you are), that makes councillors comments even more duplicitous, definitely not a act of good faith. Methinks more litigation may arise.

Ps - what is the definition of duplicitous?

How do we know that wasn't all that was offered. And 4 years would have been time to build up the trust councillor Thompson asked for. And yet less than 4 weeks wasps buzz in?

I assume this refers to our unaffordable lease having been led up the garden path by the illustrious (and now demonstrably untrustworthy) council

I think the latest episode shows that the council are two faced and acting in an underhand way. On the return to the Ricoh, councillor Thompson said that CCFC ownership was not out of the realms of possibility, but a period of time to rebuild trust between the parties would be necessary. Now...

What is the truth, do you really know - does anyone?

Not entirely sure the council have done everything they could have done to KCIC. They might have not reneged on the deal regarding the land for the Ricoh at the outset, for example.

Yes, you would scrap it

Of course it matters if it was or wasn't. If it wasn't, there is nothing to deny.

It wasn't me, honest.

Sorry, it must be sought after - my copy went within minutes of putting it on.

I have just put my copy on ebay - search for Goodbye Highfield Road