Search results

I'm talking about this from a law perspective regardless of colour or anything else, he has a good shot at getting off with self defence according to the letter of the law.

I agree, as much as he's a prick, he looks in a bad way and you don't just leave him there. You never know, it might have knocked some sense in to him.

if I was in his position it's definitely the root I'd go down. I've seen people get off with similar stuff.

there's every chance he'd get off with self defence. You don't have to be attacked, just under threat of attack. The way the guy was moving towards him I'd say he has a good shout.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/17/climate/alaska-oil-drilling-anwr.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

if only there'd been a similar issue in Scotland to alert him to the fact there could be a problem and then he could have jumped straight on it.

yet the education secretary didn't have the wherewithal to put in place something similar to Ians suggestion and has now had to do a u turn.

not saying it's perfect but some of the down grades were scandalous.

as someone who is currently updating his less than impressive CV at least mine doesn't have a 'sacked for treason' on it!

which sort of proves my point. I know it's always been this way but it would be great if people tried thinking for themselves and doing a bit of research for one, it's really frustrating.

to be fair that's preferable to them digging their heels in.

They're not rumours. No problem with people criticising Corbyn on the issue it's just frustrating that others don't get the same scrutiny

Yep.

If Skripal was such a huge issue why did people vote for a man who's in balls deep with all sorts of dodgy Russians?

love listening to him. Like listening to his brother as well though not as much. Agree with Christopher on a lot of things but not the Iraq war, more in Peters camp on that. Disagree strongly with his brother on a few things but I think it's silly to 'support' one or the other.

bless him

Chain of command is Johnson at the top of the tree with Hancock next, yet somehow neither of them is responsible. It's quite incredible.

she gets blamed for everything

confirmation of a partnership, some sort of realistic timescale for each phase of the project and a commitment to communicate regularly how they are progressing .

I think it's quiet clear that there needs to be some movement on this fairly rapidly. I'm giving them until the end of October to see some clear progress.