Search results

He doesn’t expect you to understand

Why bother?

The tory vote declined didn’t it?

Well I don’t think anyone can understand a rationale that suggests the opposite of what actually happened in the one by election that this has been an issue with You don’t agree with Angela Rayners comments then?

Weaponising 50% of the electorate do much they couldn’t be bothered to vote 😂😂

over 8 million are over 13 years old - as a guess I’d say there must be at least 6 to 8 million diesel vehicles that would be impacted

The most recent cat parc data says that the average life of cars prior to scrap is at an all time high

Brilliant so anyone who has an old car gets a new one? Everywhere or just London?

How?

Lol https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/21/starmer-urges-khan-to-reflect-on-ulez-rules-after-uxbridge-defeat

Im finding your argument bizarre. Low earners own exactly the cars that will be penalised here I’m just showing you 7 out of 10 own a car in London vs 7.8 nationally Low earners drive old cars - high earners will still be driving their cars into these zones - many self employed labourers have...

Christ it’s like an apprentice candidate

A bit difficult if your on the horse

This https://centreforlondon.org/blog/car-ownership-census/ It is going to disadvantage low earners who own cars and they will have cars that get charged. Also diesel vans for plumbers electricians etc

outer London car ownership isn’t massively different to other cities - 70% have a car

Good old Ed

Labour actually only gained 3,000 votes in the North Yorkshire election - Tory voters abstained - it will be interesting in a general election where they vote The labour 3,000 gain virtually matched the Lib Dem decline in the vote

The point is there is an expectation that they would and the loans are structured in such a way that it’s financially punitive if they don’t

Clearly in the party goers home patch “no one cares about parties lads”

So?