Search results

Well oddly enough I wouldn’t have even known about it until you’ve highlighted it Not especially edifying but not really much different to the deputy labour leader calling Tories racist, misogynistic, homophobic scum - something I don’t think you were too outraged about at the time

Well that’s kind of my point

I thought it was more amusing than your twitter exclusive.

He may have now been released but played 60 times for Zwolle - part of the promotion winning team there

Kasteneer is playing in the second division isn’t he?

Well he was ahead of him last season and offered a contract so in all likelihood he will again

I doubt there will be many clubs challenging for the top 6 in the championship who would want Norton Cuffey - he'd be available if we want him as long as he gets sufficient game time

Not to me. Whats it doing for you? Here is the radical media landscape viewing on offer today https://www.tvguide.co.uk/mobile/channellisting.asp?ch=121#700045504

My point is it started as a public company - was not nationalised afterwards - and it was introduced when there were 3 channels as a means to offer an alternative, radical outlook I think 1980's TV is a bit different and limited versus 2023

Still a fan of Location Location Tony?

It wasn’t actually nationalised and if it was a private company you certainly wouldn’t be nationalising it

Anyway it was this nonsense I was talking about https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/gregg-wallace-british-miracle-meat-real-b2381116.html

Its sort of the argument deployed to retain the Royal Family - namely their wages pay for themselves Recent attempts to measure the size of the impact of the royal family on UK tourism have estimated the capital value of UK monarchy as a business to be £67.5 billion (up from £44 billion in...

Well it isn't it was a glib comment to a programme no one it seems watched It is interesting though how it uses a GDP argument to support its reasoning to remain under public ownership as even when it makes losses (as it has done in the past) it uses an argument that it still makes positive net...

Which would occur whoever owns it

What did you think of the programme?

I wish he’d been eaten

Well ok the government should sell channel 4 which would yield £1 billion to pay on worthwhile projects

if it was an obvious draw they’d have to let people in for free