Search results

If they didn’t at least offer it to the football club at the appropriate rate, they really would end up looking like the malicious conniving twats that they are.

If the EU complaint was upheld, breaking wasps in the process, wouldn’t the council be left in the position of having to recover a financial embarrassment with not unlimited ways of doing it? Plus some political embarrassment as well?

One of which would be an unsponsored poorly attended Rugby stadium, the other a football stadium. Highly unlikely to happen though.

Undisclosed fees?

Our footballing style would be streets ahead of everyone else’s. Kastaneer would have to kerb his enthusiasm for a sliding tackle.

Pitch would be a bit bumpy now. Could play plenty of wall passes though.

Some great goals there. What a season!

Voted

So you would be happy with watching crap football and the team losing every week, tumbling down the leagues into Sunday football as long as it was at the Ricoh. That scenario wouldn’t be a great epitaph for 100 years of history, would it?

The argument over players wages isn’t going to help wasps. How do you define hard ball?

On your assumptions it looks like an additional promotion/ Ricoh return premium of an additional £4.68 million. You say a rent of £3.999 million would be commercially beneficial which would be giving Wasps 85% of that premium. May be marginally commercially beneficial but still doesn’t make...

I’m sorry, but anything up to £4million a year would be OK? You must be joking, surely . £1.1 million was too much and saw us off to Northampton.

Can’t see any reason to keep Ponticelli or Wakefield or Allesani or Hiwula

Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant. What a fantastic run to take us clear at the top, that’s what makes this so deserved. And I think only Liverpool have lost less games in the top 4 divisions.

The clubs can vote however they like, testing doesn’t affect that. Of course, the EFL may have been given a pretty strong indication of how the clubs will vote fairly and have acted accordingly.

No, the vote is Tuesday.

Tranmere’s document is really badly written with the financial consequences tables being particularly bad.

Given that Tranmere’s proposal is based on a mathematical model, I found this worrying:- Applying the MFE outcome sees Wycombe in the play offs but along with 3 other Clubs (Rotherham, Peterborough, Sunderland & Doncaster) who are included as potential play-off candidates.” Isn’t that 4 other...

Depends what their job is. Someone on the track at JLR is providing a service to their employer.

There was another article in the Mail saying that HMRC have told Rugby clubs that their players could return to training without affecting furlough as the players are not providing a service to their employers. Presumably that would apply to football as well!