Search results

Right, the reason he has been suspended is he said "AS has been dramatically overstated for political reasons". That is all, he'll be allowed back but Labour can not be seen to be allowed people to come up with bile like that.

The report doesn't call him an AS either He has been suspend as he is peddling the it's overstated for political reasons bollocks. Sorry but there were some horrible AS around the party and if he can't accept that then he can fuck off

He said the AS problem was "dramatically overstated" and deserved to be suspended. If you think that is ok then maybe I was wrong about you.

Aye swiftly agreed to implement every single recommendation. Some folk talk such awful bollocks though.

And he's not been called an antisemite He's been suspended from the PLP as he is still pretending that AS was not a problem under his watch.

There will be no split as I said no one is going to risk losing their seat

nah they haven't got the bottle to form a new party as in the end they'll want to stand in any future election as a Labour candidate. No one wants to end up like The Change UK crew. Corbyn will end up back in the PLP after a suitable punishment period.

He's been suspended and rightly as he is being a fucking arse

Oncde again someone going for the the strawman argument

I said it was easy to do, you started talking fucking rubbish once again. all it takes is a law to be passed so stop fucking lying and making a state of yourself. You did this about the football as well and even Clint laughed at you.

Once again you are changing the goalposts you're done here

Yes and they had a 4-4 conservative to liberal balance with a empty seat so why would they? You are claiming it takes political skill to expand the court. It doesn't it just takes a simple bill to pass congress. Sorry but it's madness that you are even arguing this.

Wow these are states trump won in 2016

Because you very rarely have times when both houses and the executive are in the same hands. It is the nuclear option but it is very easy to do if you control the 3 things needed.

They couldn't get Garland through as they didn't control the Senate. I'll explain it again. They are favoured to come out of the election controlling the White House, the Senate and the HoR. This means that all it would take is 1 bill to be raised and passed by both houses and the Supreme...

This is who FDR was up against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_coalition

FDR had opposition from the conservative south democrat senators and representatives so wouldn't of been able to get the bill through congress. Very different now as unlike the 1930s all democrats are broadly the same in political outlook.

It's far easier just to expand it, as I said it just takes congress to pass a law. The democrats are more likely than not to be in charge of both houses and the white house so all it takes is one member of each house to bring the bill and it's good to go.

Yep not a jot about it apart from the various members of the senate and congress posting and tweeting about it.

the name shane