Search results

Best goal I’ve seen has to be Huckerby vs Man Utd, not just the goal which is top class but the atmosphere of that game winning it in the closing minutes.

Kelly’s only in cos Hamer is out. I’d agree I’d have him ahead of Kelly when that’s the case. But you’re saying he should be starting so drop Hamer? I think his decent performances are too rare and his anonymous performances too common personally. I’d rather have a more commanding CM in. Which...

Allen is not a DM. He’s had several disasters there.

Who would you drop for him? O’Hare?

Dabo is awful at fullback. I’d have the same concerns about him as Maatsen TBH. Plus as I say you’d have to drop Fadz as he doesn’t have the pace to play in a two. I just don’t think we have the squad to make it work TBH as much as I’d like to see it given a go.

He has before. Like I say I don’t think I we’ve got the squad for a flat back four, but he played it at points last season and in L1/2 seasons so it’s not like he’s ideologically opposed. I think the main reason he avoids it right now is Fadz in a back two and the defensive abilities of our...

No chance Chelsea recall him. He’s nowhere near their first team.

I was saying on Twitter that the wage bill is the real issue. We seemingly don’t have the budget for a squad of championship quality players. We’re 8/9 players short from a full squad (2 permanent players in every position, I’d argue we’d need: GK, CB, LCB x 2, LWB x 2, CM x 2, AM) and that’s...

Why not both? Moore Kane Rose Fadz Maatsen Hamer Sheaf McKinstry O’Hare Jone Györkeres As I say above I’d worry about the defence but I do like a 4231 formation personally.

Problem isn’t really the lack of wingers as much as lack of fullbacks. Kane might be OK but I’d worry about Maatsen and possibly even the CBs in a flat back four.

Ah it’s new this year.

Id guess constantly misrepresenting articles. Although when they do all of them it tends to be breach of TOS like buying followers.

My understanding is fireworks aren’t banned in the Netherlands at Nee Years but are the rest of the year.

Yes that’s exactly what I think. Guilt by association isn’t a legal thing. Police need reasonable suspicion to investigate someone. Simply knowing someone isn’t that. As I said there have been accusations against Prince Andrew and hopefully he’ll get the book thrown at him if proven, and...

I sort of get this response, but for what? Should we investigate everyone on a non celeb pedos FB friend list too? Prince Andrew is being investigated because there’s actual accusations against him. Same with Spacey. What would you be investigating otherwise? It’s basically a who’s who of...

It’s more the Blair derangement syndrome TBH. Considering there’s sitting MPs in the book, but they don’t get mentioned because they weren’t connected to a PM a quarter of a century ago.

This one?

That’s a fair point, though Østigård has a 50p head, I’d still rather we looked for someone with better passing and an actual goal threat. If Fadz goes we may as well play every corner short right now.

More people at home I’d guess.

This will definitely ruin Blair’s chances at the next general election. I do find it cute how the Corbynites and the Tories are singing from the same hymn sheet now :p