Search results

Not sure I'm quite alive yet. Give me a couple of hours.

I'm pretty sure that TM said there was nothing between the 2 keepers in his opinion.

Be happy with 1-1 myself. Draw our away games and win at home and we'll be on a winner.

I would stick with Charles-Cook. In saying that though, Burge did nowt wrong at all the last 2 or 3 games he was in. For me Charle-Cook just looks more confident and assured. His command appears better too. That first game his handling was excellent. I would stick with Charles-Cook...

I was there too. Gutted we missed out that night. If I recall though our penalties were pretty dreadful weren't they? I seem to remember us missing 2 at least.

------ Charles-Cook Ricketts Martin Reda Stokes JOB Fleck Vincelot Murphy ----- Lameiras ----- Fortune

Just wish we had Armstrong back for Saturday. As it stands I would go for the following; -------Charles-Cook Ricketts, Martin, Reda, Stokes JOB, Fleck, Vincelot, Murphy ------ Lameiras ------- Fortune

I'm very much hoping he signs the ever so talented, top international, rock solid Andy Webster in time for Saturday.

Exactly, stupot. What you have in your locker when you have a potent goal scorer like Armstrong in your team, is the ability to score goals even when you are not playing well. Players like him can win you matches for you almost single handedly. What we apparently had last night was a team in...

We had 13 shots again last night and 7 on target. Our goals to shot ratio is worrying. JOB always seems able to chip in with a few goals from midfield, but at the moment he appears to be badly out of form and Fleck has never scored enough.

I would say the concerns we do have are: 1. Without Armstrong our attack seems a lot more powder puff. 2. Philips is seemingly going backwards. 3. Haynes continues not to impress. 4. Murphy's performances are very inconsistent. Unstoppable one week, out of sorts the next. 5. Tudgay is not a...

TM has actually said though that players were injured. This includes Fortune and Stokes. Vincelot, he says had an op in the summer and needed resting. Reda, we know needs treating carefully. It seems TM was kinda forced into changes rather than set out to deliberately select a second string 11.

Seems to me that all that was lacking was a killer instinct in front of goal. We were missing our top goal scorer. You have to believe that had Armstrong been playing we would have won. Can't see how last night can be compared to when Pressley was in charge, because this was very much a second...

Thank you!! I've been saying we've got a thin squad for weeks now, but many argue it's not. As someone pointed out, we have players to come in, but have no strength in depth. Rather lost without Armstrong. Rather lost without Vincelot. And I dare say, we'll be a bit lost withiout Ricketts too.

It deserted us.

I am bowing out of this thread now. We can either play ping with this debate back and forth on here until we lose the will to live, or we can wait to hear the evidence. I think I will choose the latter.

Besides Armstrong do we have a true goalscorer? We have ones who will always chip in here and there (Fortune, Tudgay, Murphy), but it seems like we only have Armstrong as an out and our goal getter. That's a worry.

Shitty tinpot cup anyway isn't it!! Good ridance,

Oh bugger ................. Night. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Yay! Is that it, all over?