Search results

According to that image I posted, block 11 holds 1,029. Blocks 11 to 13 hold 1,858. Whether opening them creates extra revenue depends on whether it is new bums in seats, or current bums moving from elsewhere.

I meant the North Stand, geography was never a strong point. If only they published in portrait rather than landscape. Thank god for satnav

Yours was quite Monopoly logical.

Oh, come on. Surely they will turn up eventually!

That would be good if they could do it during an international break. Not sure if they would have to wait for close season though.

I think club will be taking a risk: benefit approach. While seats elsewhere ( other than corporate) remain unsold, ignoring all this safety stuff puts the club at risk for no benefit. If 3,000 people were being denied tickets, that balance obviously changes and gives the club some ammunition to...

Yes, silly Me.

Have a standing area in Singers Corner, no objection from me. If it is doable, reduce the segregation area, no objection from me. If it isn’t doable, give a full and frank explanation to us, the supporters. Move the away supporters to the opposite corner in the South stand, then I will object.

it could equally be said that you and a few others have a clear agenda which is at odds with the proposal which is being consulted on. I post regularly on this thread because I disagree with the agenda some are heavily promoting. I am not against safe standing in Singers Corner and I agree, in...

You will all have the police knocking on your door.

Perhaps the stadium is just a shit design in a shit location, trying to be a multipurpose facility rather than just a sporting arena.

First image shows capacity with current segregation - 30,370, about 1,000 of which are on the corporate balcony. So far attendance has averaged 24,778 so over 5,500 unsold seats. The second image is the layout for the Harry Styles concert. Frasers won’t want seating capacity for concerts to be...

I can assure you I’m not a SAG member, related to one, a councillor etc. I’m not in the least bit bothered about safe standing in blocks 13 to 16, row U upwards as per the proposal. If consulted on what is currently a fantasy proposal to move away supporters to the North Stand, I would object...

Thanks, that was really interesting. Honestly.

OK, why do we have a SAG? Because the responsible authority decided that’s what they were going to have and how they were going to manage things. If you don’t like it, write to the council with a reasoned argument proposing an alternative.

Capacity with current segregation is about 30,000 so we are about 5k of that. Stadium certainly doesn’t seem anywhere near “full” in the home arwas.

Not advisory if council have delegated authority to them. As I have said before, overrule or ignore them and things go pear shaped, you are in deep shit.

See above

May apply where council haven’t delegated powers. Also, the whole guidance needs to be read to get the context and at the moment I can’t be arsed to do it. The main thing is there is a SAG in Coventry overseeing CBS and Butts Park. NB The use of the word “may” in terms of attendance.

I’m sure someone said that the council had delegated its powers to the SAG. In any event, if SAGs advice is ignored and it all goes pear shape the club wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.