Search results

Bury's defending has been shambolic. First two goals were dreadful from their perspective. First one Stokes was unmarked and the Cargill one no challenge was made on him at all. They stood off Maddison for his goal and the keeper was beaten far too easily for the 4th. We'll obviously take...

No.

Yep. That's it. Sent from my LG-D405 using Tapatalk

Just dawned on me. Bury were top and were looking favourites to go up. They have now been on a very bad run of form. Does that coincide with them suddenly fielding 6 ex City players?

Could be 6 of them today. That must be the most ever surely!

Used to be we always won on legends day, but that kind of went down the plug hole lately.

Yep. Always half-time.

3 games, 3 defeats, 7 goals conceded. These two young lad's, Cargill and Stephens, sound good enough to me. Would guess Ricketts to right back, Stephens and Cargill as the centre backs and Stokes at left back. That will then allow Vincelot to come straight back in.

I reckon 7 wins would do it though. Not top, but second place perhaps. And I keep waiting for that Burton poor run but it never seems to happen.

Could have a sneaky little bet on Clarke scoring the winner for us, mind! Skim off the top of his head for an own goal!!

Thanks. Could never bet against the City though.

Falls down a bit though. We don't play Fleetwood for two weeks.

Cheers. Wouldn't go into a bookies. Would out a bet online though. Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

I see there could be six ex City players against us this afternoon. Have we got enough boo in us for that for 90 mins?

Anyone please tell me how you would have a specific combination bet online, such as City to win 4-0, with Maddison scoring? Complete novice here. Just had a quick look and I can't see such an option. Can see 4-0 and can see Maddison to score, but can't see a specific score with him getting a...

Unbelievable! Surely that is much worse than Johnson. She was a teacher and she started a sexual relationship with a girl when the girl was just 14. 18 months is just ridiculous and a teacher is much more a role model than a footballer any day of the week.

Okay, cool. Will check it out. Thanks, Nick. Always like your recommendations. Except for the crap ones of course. ;)

Right, never, ever heard that term before. Yep, just looked it up and that's what it is. Seemingly some called him a paedophile and that is not correct. He is not sexually attracted to children apparently. This girl looked older than 15, so I am guessing at first he did think she was older. No...

I had a dream last night we won 4-0. Last time's dream didn't come to fruition though, cos I had us to draw 1-1 against Scunthorpe. Last night I dreamt of a 4-0 and a wonder goal from Maddison as he danced his way into the penalty area and smashed the ball past their keeper.

I think if this girl with Johnson had have been 16 or 17 the same desire and lust would have been there. I don't think he targeted her because she was 15. I believe paedophiles wouldn't be interested in a 17 year old. They want the child to be a child. That's the whole attraction. A slight...