Search results

That’s wrong. The EFL rule is a minimum of 2000. The 10% applies where maximum capacity is less than 20,000, so for Luton would have been approximately 1,100.

I think Adge was referring to the red card incident?

I think the problem is that the way it operates seems to undermine their credibility anyway.

What is equally telling is that, in the highlights, not one Leicester player appeals for a penalty before it Is awarded.

OK, I get the explanation, but if the linesman has a different perspective (as they generally will do) surely it makes sense, especially in the absence of VAR, to consult with them. BTW, could you explain to me how it is that referees generally appear to have a better view than the linesman of...

And get it wrong.

If Thomas had the speed of thought to do that, he could equally have had the speed of thought to have not considered his action to be reckless.

It's the angle, the ref sees the incident from the back and, as mentioned somewhere previously, may not have seen Thomas get the ball first. I was pretty much in line with the play and could clearly see that Thomas had got the ball first, as could everyone around me and as should the linesman as...

Does the etc include anything about goalkeepers, e.g. dropping to the floor unnecessarily?

What about from the linesmans' view? Wait a minute - (a) he was crap and (b) they don't actually do anything these days, do they?

Have you forgotten Allen?

Coventry 3 Leicester 1: The new Grealish firing Coventry’s promotion push By Tom Collomosse at the CBS Arena THREE years after Jack Grealish became the most expensive British footballer in history, another playmaker with a snazzy haircut is making a name for himself in the West Midlands. Like...

If those stills showed a situation where Thomas had missed the ball and caught the man, then clear penalty and potential red card. However , that isn’t the case.

Where was the blood pouring from the studs having hit his thigh?

If he runs across the player, that player then runs into him and it will be deemed a penalty.

It was reckless with the potential to cause serious injury, as you would put it. Far more reckless than Thomas.

That was after 94 minutes, the tosser.

So then you should have said can’t follow through and potentially cause serious injury. Didn’t seem to be a mark in his leg.

What serious injury did he cause?

He must have been bleeding like a stuck pig after that.