Search results

I say knock down Bablake school cos Coventry doesn't do rich people.

Not for the mistakes he has been making, no, but yes in terms of his general command of his area.

Not being funny, but looking at that pic, if you built 4 stands to expand the capacity, then where would people park and I'm not even just talking about fans here, also talking about players and club officials, visiting officials etc.? Maybe we'll have to bus them in too! ;)

Yeah but that's before we became so brilliant and reporters would now rather report on a big club (Coventry) than a small club (Everton).

Really? Think most people will disagree with you unfortunately. Burge was a very jittery nervy keeper who showed little command of his area. I know he's the only other keeper and I know RCC has cost us points, but our back four has looked more solid with RCC behind the sticks. Bringing back a...

Yep, Bigi was a 6 out of 10. Not bad, not great. Did some stuff well, but a lot of his passing was wayward.

Fine if the answer is to bring in an experienced keeper, but going back to Burge would be a retrograde step surely. Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

Perfectly reasonable logic. So you think a keeper who keeps making mistakes is going to keep getting away with it? Just because the defence got him out of jail, or the opposition strikers failed to take advantage of his mistakes is absolutely no reason to bring Burge back in.

What is deluded is to put back in a keeper that was making more mistakes than the one we have in now, surely? Burge was nervy, very poor on crosses and his distribution wasn't good. We replaced him with a more confident keeper, who was confident on crosses and whose distribution was much better...

2. Cos the Ricoh is a great stadium and one day we may be able to get our hands on it and also because I don't think 1 will ever happen or is feasible.

What, one crock for another? Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

Burge was making loads of mistakes and wasn't coming off his line half the time to catch crosses. Because they didn't result in goals, people have seemingly forgotten that and erased them from their memories.

But not only that, we've also fluffed some gilt edged chances too. Twice on Saturday square balls from either Kent or Armstrong would have probably resulted in goals. Armstrong missed a great chance against Sheff Utd. too.

Having two weak fullbacks in Phillips and Haynes and a makeshift centre back certainly didn't help. Even though Stokes aquitted himself quite well, he most certainly doesn't have the presence of Turner or Reda does he. We had a very weak back line on Saturday. If it's a similar scenario this...

No way you can build a stadium large enough at the Butts. Just not possible. There's the retirement village within yards too. You think a 30,000 seater stadium can be built right next door to a retirement village? Seriously? It's a nonsense and to talk of a 'squeeze' is laughable unfortunately.

Can't see any way at all where you could squeeze a 20,000 seater in, let alone a 30,000 seater.

We could all go to a car showroom though and look at a Ferrari couldn't we, even though we haven't got this money and know we can't afford it. ;)

Yep, but as soon as it was mooted loads of us straight away said you couldn't get a 20,000+ seater stadium in that location. Physically impossible before you even start to go into development costs. Development costs shouldn't be an issue though should it if we have loads of investors ready to...

He is. He does get subbed a lot though and I think it was Peterborough he was yanked off at half time. He was very, very poor that day. I think there is a place for him, but not as a regular starter game in game out regardless. We need to pick the games where we feel we can utilise him best...

'The size is a restriction.' Well what a shock! I certainly didn't see that coming. Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk