Search results

:joyful:

No, but if you are going to make things up, that aren't there, then I will refer you to posts that reiterate what I'm saying. Any comment on post #156 that SkyBlueBear posted?

I asked the question, in the OP, "Or are the rest going to other hospitals?" The visit would be more valuable than the gifts, IMO. Going to argue that as well?

And at which point/post did I say negative things about those that did go? I didn't mention the value of the gifts, before you try that.

The opening post, really negative towards those that did go from CCFC..... CCFC92: 5 CCFC staff members turned up, 3 players, 1 coach and Sam Ricketts. Now, fair play to those who did turn up, but 3 of the playing squad? Or are the rest going to other hospitals?

If you read the thread, you'd realise Nick and Torch are making out something that isn't there. They have no counter argument to the OP, which is: A low turn out from CCFC players in a Coventry hospital, so they say "So charity to sick kids is negative is it?" **** This is a paraphrase, not a...

Nick, Torch etc. Please read this (carefully), it is 100% the point I'm trying to make.

Just like Torch can say "the point stands" and that's that.

That wasn't the OP. You are using other posts by other posters, to attack my point, which isn't relevant to other posts.

And in that time, CCFC will upload round two of hospital visits with the full squad there :eggonface: Then Nick and Torch can live happily ever after :)

Shopping was an example. I could have picked Nando's, playing video games, playing golf, getting their hair done? 3 players turning up, and Sordell playing Santa on his own, points to this, IMO.

I like it how you keep spouting this, as you have no response to the actual OP.

I took that info on board didn't I? I didn't dismiss it to suit my point?

Tis what happens when you have people unable to read posts properly :(

100% agree, no arguments. One thing we all know, is most of the players weren't there, for whatever reason, but they weren't there.

No, and as you clearly have read all the posts carefully in this thread and taken the content included on board, you will see I've included Sordell in the praise.

Irrelevant what they were doing, they weren't there were they?

Oh really? So the players that didn't turn up (which this whole post is about, not those who did) is positive? I've praised those that did turn up. I haven't said the players should have given more financially. Please explain where I've targeted anything positive?

Yeah? Then you replied directly to me? Nick : "Oh no, somebody doesn't think the players donating an estimated £200 each for a local hospital is a bad thing, they must be "flame baiting". I'm not the one who brought it up to have digs the week after it happened, am I?" Please post where I said...

I'm not the one talking about how much the gifts cost? Try again, Nick. Try actually reading the posts and seeing who posts them before going on the attack.