Search results

  1. MalcSB

    New number one needed

    Collins is, indeed, a number 2. He shouldn’t be first choice goalkeeper either.
  2. MalcSB

    Next supporters forum 18 April

    Sniffer dogs. I am sorry but I have zero tolerance of illegal use of Class A drugs.
  3. MalcSB

    Player Ratings

    You never watched Eric McManus then.
  4. MalcSB

    Next supporters forum 18 April

    Oh, so thats OK then. We just put up with it,
  5. MalcSB

    Next supporters forum 18 April

    Why not?
  6. MalcSB

    Referee

    If only we had VAR
  7. MalcSB

    Callum O'Hare

    Fascinated to hear him speak Spanish!
  8. MalcSB

    This is proof of why the decision was incorrect even if a toenail offside

    Snag is, that article is three years old and clearly not been implemented. I think IFAB intervened in respect of the offside.
  9. MalcSB

    MR profile

    Greedy and unrealistic.
  10. MalcSB

    MR profile

    This is the 7th decade in which I have followed City, I would like us to get back to the prem in my lifetime, so I would prefer to concentrate on the league. FA cup wins - got the t shirt!
  11. MalcSB

    We should not let this go, the game is corrupt to the core

    The only picture I have seen with a vertical line was where the vertical went to AWB’s armpit, not his shoulder. There is obviously quite a difference - more than a toenail- between armpit and shoulder. As you can score with your shoulder, then the measurements should be from AWB’s shoulder as...
  12. MalcSB

    MR profile

    I wonder whether King will want another distracting cup run.
  13. MalcSB

    Next supporters forum 18 April

    They could have sniffer dogs wandering about.
  14. MalcSB

    Next supporters forum 18 April

    Clearly. Strange.
  15. MalcSB

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    How can you possibly know that? It would be completely the opposite of what happened with the non-offside.
  16. MalcSB

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Only if VAR considered the on field decision to be correct. Therefore it was a clear Penalty.
  17. MalcSB

    Anyone see

    To be fair, I had a chat with a couple of Coventry fans who had southern accents.
  18. MalcSB

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    The penalty was a penalty. Seen by the Referee and would have been reviewed by VAR and not overturned.
  19. MalcSB

    Peter Bankes needs investigating

    Having just listened to Keith Hackett, there is no way that the on field decision should have been overturned given the technology available.
Top