Search results

Cool mate, would you like to show us the studies that show vaccinated people aren't less likely to pass on the virus?

yes that's basic vaccine science

no because that is how vaccines work you utter lego eating weirdo

not got an answer to this then you thick easily led "sheeple" weirdo

what facts? you are disputing hundreds of years of vaccine research on the basic premise of how the work going all the way back to edward jenner so surely you can enlighten us with the "facts" on how they really work

what facts weirdo?

i am liking his arguing that the basic premise on how vaccines work is a big pharma lie angle he is either a wum or a weirdo

also a much bigger chance of giving it to others

you have no "facts" just a load of incorrect derping

if i say so? it's how vaccines work. there is no other angle on this

Cycle thresholds low or high have absolutely no baring on how vaccines work at their basic level They still take time to teach the body how to react to the threat it is protecting against.

No it's not mate, I think you know you talking some utter shite but you've gone too far down the rabbit hole to admit this

I'm not even sure you know what a vaccine actually is or does? It doesn't inject a "cure" in to the body. It injects a substance that teaches your body that something is a threat and allows it to build up it's own defences against that threat. This is why you are not fully protected until x...

That is basic science though. The antibodies take time to fully develop in your system. There's decades of study on this.

so you admit that they have been discredited which means proved wrong? Unless checked? It was the checking of what they said that leads to them being discredited, well that and things they said would happen proved to be wrong by not happening. Do you even know what you are typing as you are...

Been absolutely rocking this year to be fair

So many words and yet none of them are anything to do with why people don't take the word of someone who is not a specialist and was easily laughed at because his basic maths when talking about Sweden was wrong. I'm take the word of the vast majority of virology experts over you and you frankly...

Defence looks far more balanced when JCS plays and Hyam is far better at RCB where Ostigard would of played meaning he would of had to play LCB. Move on

He's not a virologist though is he Mate you're a plum and a dangerous one.

Or at least James Cracknell it