Search results

If ACL haven't met with Appleton before who did they make the agreement with to have the last 3 games of the season at the Ricoh?

what does the current lease actually cover? if it's only for use of the ground for x number of days a year could holdings not have a separate lease? I appreciate there's the FL rule about having first pick of dates but we all know there isn't going to be 2 Coventry City sides in L1 next year...

ACL statement says but ACL told Sky Blue Trust and the CT reported Doen't seem to match for me. Now I'm not saying SISU are right here and ACL wrong but I think a lot of people take any statement that comes from SISU as being 100% lies and anything from ACL as 100% truth, IMO the truth...

Unless this has changed in the last week ccc haven't actually sourced any money from the public works loans, it's come from "council cash balances", not entirely sure what that is but I assume its the money they have in the bank from council tax.

I'm not in favour of playing any home games outside of Coventry but given the status of things between SISU and ACL there absolutely has to be a contingency plan. To not have one means that should we get to the start of the season without an agreement to play at the Ricoh we are thrown out of...

I couldn't care less if we moved from the Ricoh to eventually play somewhere else in the city. Of course there would have to be a viable plan and I assume the FL would put something in place to ensure it's stuck to as they aren't going to let the club move out of Cov forever. Of course there's...

If it was secured against anything it would be the lease. York Bank aren't in the business of managing stadiums so now doubt they would have looked to sell the lease on to recover as much of the debt as they could. Wonder who would be interested in buying that?! I think we can accept that...

It's all SISUs fault ;)

we need to remember that any kind of audit or court action will be based solely around what is or isn't legal (if legal is the right term when referring to state aid). As long as SISU have acted legally, even if they have massively bent the rules, they're fine. What's right morally or ethically...

Not sure why people have a problem with the CT publishing this, it's clear it's from SISU side as it's papers that have lodged. It also says the council were asked to respond to the points raised and didn't. Either SISU seriously think they have a case or it's a tactic to delay things / put...

admin doesn't have to mean you lose all the debt and start again with new owners. Lets say SISU, or a SISU associate, is owed the £60m. They would then have to agree any CVA to prevent further points penalty. Lets say £30m of that debt isn't money SISU have put it (was carried over when they...

that makes more sense than everyone being booted out. isn't that fairly standard under administation as the administrator has to cut costs as low as possible?

are we talking about all the players being released or just being told who is being released? if SISU try and release all the players things could get interesting quickly as that's sure to light a fire under the FL and PFA.

I might have imagined it or made it up but I think there's different rules for performance enhancing and recreational and recreational is a 30 (or maybe 60 day) ban and not officially announced anywhere. I guess if Ferdinand missed a test they assume the worst and ban as if it were performance...

I don't think drugs test failures get officially announced anywhere, is it not just a 30 day suspension which could be passed off as an injury?

That's not how I interpret what he's saying. Bear in mind that as administrator he can't run the company at a loss, to me it looks like he's saying holdings paid before, they are prepared to pay now so take the money off them. Didn't Gregor Rioch say he would pay it himself? Why not accept that...