Search results

Im not sure how knee jerk actions like this will encourage private investment in Labours energy company.

Just more detail behind the story. I have seen elsewhere that the government are denying this. https://www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/556575/ed-miliband-blocks-new-north-sea-drilling/ https://www.express.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/1921906/just-four-days-into-job He doesn't just...

I wish I was an expert on everything. https://www.aberdeenlive.news/news/aberdeen-news/ed-miliband-orders-immediate-ban-9403907

Characterised by some who finished third in their group progressing to the knock out stages.

Fucking ridiculous, as one of the responses to the tweet suggests we will be buying from Putin instead. Still, what can you expect from someone who cant manage a bacon batch.

But people who voted for the Lib Dem’s didn’t vote for Labour, so they voted for a party in competition with Labour and hence anti- Labour.

Not entirely correct 91.4 % didn’t vote for reform, but not what the debate was about.

You said votes, not seats.

I was responding to Bright Sky Blues’ observation that the was a bigger anti Tory vote than pro Tory vote in 2010, so presumably you argument stands for then as well.

Hasn't there just been a bigger anti Labour vote than pro Labour?

I’m thoroughly confused, which is easily done. Wouldn’t a FPTP system allowing a huge majority in the house whilst only garnering 20% of the electorate facilitate a move to a one party state when compared with a PR system with the inevitable coalition and hence power sharing. Even with a ”two...

Sarah Coombes?

Exactly, although 2010 was a coalition so at least 59% of votes cast were represented in government.

Even more so when it’s a party who hasn’t convinced even a quarter of the country,

Not sure that had anything to do with a voting system.

Coincides with Shaw bringing more balance to the left wing.

So that’s three then.

93rd minute.

Well bloody hell, in the Final.

Look at all those England players who need booking!