Search results

Pensioners are already.

No, I’m not. I spent my entire working life (except for 15 months) in the NHS so I have experienced the low and zero pay rises. The Tories ignored so called independent pay review bodies for many years so this could be considered a special case catch up. However, we both know that it will be...

Bear in mind Stevenage charged £15. Who knows how much Frasers have charged for use of the stadium. points would have been a good idea.

Yes, public sector pay awards have been below inflation, including zero for a number of years. These above inflation awards, however deserved they may be, are bound to end up being viewed as a starting point for the private sector. That will be inflationary.

Do you think what has happened lately is hyperinflation? Should look back to the mid 70’s.

Yes.

I’m only hypothesising, I have suggested @Sky Blue Pete asks for the rationale.

Actually, the more I think about it, the more sensible an idea it was.

Bastards. Although, on reflection, no pensioners should need the winter fuel payment because Labour are going to reduce every bodies fuel bills by £300 a year. Oh, hang on a minute, they can’t guarantee that promise because the cost of fossil fuels is so volatile. Hang on another minute, why...

That’s what I think. They should just tell those who are moaning.

Ordered mine on Friday, arrived today. Really like it.

Damned if they do and damned if they don’t. However, if there were likely to be restrictions on options for location that should have been made clear as part of the consultation process. In mitigation, the club doesn’t have a history of consulting with fans like this.

It was tongue in cheek, Mr Piggy. Glad you bit though. I assume some of your posts occupy positions 1 to 4.

This is why there needs to be an explanation why they didn’t, or couldn‘t do anything other than what they have done. It may well be that Frasers wouldn’t allow it anywhere else. Given King’s willingness to accept when the club have got things wrong, do you think it has been done for no logical...

They can just roll it out from the front to the back. Easy peasy.

There’s plenty of 20 year old Americans looking for the practice.

The civil service has plenty of resource, just not of the required quality.

It will be pretty easy to manage really. They will use the CCTV to identify which seats aren’t being sat in and cancel the STs for those seats whilst offering a one time opportunity to transfer to the safe standing areas.

Is the reason why all standing tickets haven’t been taken up the possibility of having to move for cup matches? This would happen if the 15% rule was applied. However, that rule can be overridden if the safety group raises objections on safety grounds. Depending on how the concourse arrangements...

Why wouldn’t there be strict enforcement after a few warnings? The investment has been made in safe standing which hasn’t sold out. Why bother doing that if the status quo of breaches of stadium and EFL-regulations Is to be tolerated. There will be a reason or reasons why the safe standing area...