Search results

You would have thought the EFL can't just make up random rules on the fly for our situation. So either there is a rule around stadium location which the media can confirm with them or there isn't. The only reason they would need to give us something specific was if they were relaxing the rules...

I like how they believe their knowledge of the situation is greater than our fans despite us having spent years going over every little detail. They claim to know everything but will then post things like Wasps should kick us out as they lose money everytime we play as the rent is £100K...

No idea if its had any influence but there has been people pushing the EFL to not let us play outside the city ignoring the obvious problem that will cause if we don't get a deal at the Ricoh.

Hope Orange Ken, Ranson, Hoff, Uncle Joe and Onye are in the consortium.

"no stone left unturned"

Probably because his name was getting chanted on a live TV so TalkSport have remember we exist and decided to give him a call. Last thing we need is him getting involved.

Do we have a sports psychologist at the club? I'd be getting Burge in to see someone like that and try and get him toughened up mentally. He seems to have confidence issues for long periods at a time which possibly impacts how vocal he is and his confidence in himself to come out and claim things.

They would have to take a huge salary cut to come here. And that would assume nobody in the Championship was interested in them.

Its not like this has come out of the blue. They would have been fully aware of the situation when they took the stadium on. If they haven't made an agreement with CCC that CCC cover any costs then that's nobodies fault but their own.

Possibly gives the EFL itself some protection from any SISU legal action.

Erm, its actually the court papers showing only Coventry City Council as a defendant.

If we assume Burge is going one way or another who are realistic targets to bring in? We'd have to be looking at either L2 or bottom half L1 keepers or someone higher up who can't get a game. Who will be a likely target?

I think we need to understand what happens if they vote to keep us in. The vote only happens if we don't have anywhere to play. If we have nowhere to play and they vote to not kick us out then what? Is it essentially a vote to say the club can be moved elsewhere, either temporarily or...

The reaction from some quarters when there’s even a suggestion of any action against Wasps would be hilarious if it wasn’t so tragic. Certainly puts to bed the idea that protests against Wasps are a waste of time to bed.

But we all know what happens when SISU lose that. The next appeal goes in.

No reason the Telegraph and CWR wouldn't get behind it and it requires a response from Wasps that isn't their usual 'but SISU' response. And if they try that or give another BS answer the trust should keep on at them.

I know but it just seems such an easy and obvious thing to do I struggle to see why we're as close to the deadline as we are and its not yet been taken onboard.

From the pictures of their crowd yesterday looks like the boycott is already doing very well.

The same would apply to us. If we said we aren't playing at the Ricoh but we're going to temporarily play at another stadium, that meets the FL ground requirements, in Coventry that would be fine. Problem is there isn't one.

The problem is its been left so late that there's not really time to start with a low key approach and ramp things up. I would rule out any action in the ground at a Wasps game. Just can't see it being effective. Their fans aren't really that bothered, look on their forum where there's plenty...